Source Details

View detailed information about this source submission and its extracted claims.

Back to Sources
Screenshot of https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/confusion-and-clarity-in-the-case-for-supreme-court-reform/
https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/confusion-and-clarity-in-the-case-for...
Pending
3 claims
2 weeks ago
https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/confusion-and-clarity-in-the-case-for-supreme-court-reform/

Source Information

Complete details about this source submission.

URL
https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/confusion-and-clarity-in-the-case-for-supreme-court-reform/
Overall Status
Pending
Submitted By
Donato V. Pompo
Submission Date
August 9, 2025 at 6:04 AM
Metadata
{
    "source_type": "extension",
    "content_hash": "48c8e135130add0e97c723d42dfa55d088ba53b3dcdf2c2abbf2b0a866abdb68",
    "submitted_via": "chrome_extension",
    "extension_version": "1.0.18",
    "claim_extraction_result_summary": {
        "total_processed": 3,
        "attached": 0,
        "detached": 0,
        "updated": 3,
        "target_claim_uuids": [
            "9f98e63e-7c0f-4943-afb3-4e14e847effd",
            "9f98e63f-79c3-403e-9b19-3694054440ca",
            "9f98e640-7006-4620-9e51-a1938fbab1c5"
        ],
        "updated_at": "2025-08-10T01:49:37.186211Z"
    },
    "claim_extraction_result": {
        "total_claims": 3,
        "similar_claims_found": 0,
        "new_claims_created": 3,
        "processed_claims": [
            {
                "uuid": "9f98e63e-7c0f-4943-afb3-4e14e847effd",
                "text": "This Harvard Law Review article analyzes arguments for Supreme Court reform,  weighing formal structural arguments against substantive concerns about the Court's recent decisions and their impact.",
                "simplified_text": "Harvard Law Review article analyzes arguments for Supreme Court reform",
                "claim_maker": "The author",
                "claim_subject_tags": [
                    "Supreme Court",
                    "Court Reform",
                    "Legal"
                ],
                "confidence": 1,
                "context_type": "Analysis",
                "similarity_found": false,
                "linked_to": null,
                "similarity_score": null
            },
            {
                "uuid": "9f98e63f-79c3-403e-9b19-3694054440ca",
                "text": "This Harvard Law Review article analyzes arguments for Supreme Court reform,  weighing formal structural arguments against substantive concerns about the Court's recent decisions and their impact.",
                "simplified_text": "Harvard Law Review article weighs formal structural arguments against substantive concerns",
                "claim_maker": "The author",
                "claim_subject_tags": [
                    "Supreme Court",
                    "Court Reform",
                    "Legal"
                ],
                "confidence": 1,
                "context_type": "Analysis",
                "similarity_found": false,
                "linked_to": null,
                "similarity_score": null
            },
            {
                "uuid": "9f98e640-7006-4620-9e51-a1938fbab1c5",
                "text": "This Harvard Law Review article analyzes arguments for Supreme Court reform,  weighing formal structural arguments against substantive concerns about the Court's recent decisions and their impact.",
                "simplified_text": "Harvard Law Review article weighs concerns about Court's recent decisions and their impact",
                "claim_maker": "The author",
                "claim_subject_tags": [
                    "Supreme Court",
                    "Court Reform",
                    "Legal"
                ],
                "confidence": 1,
                "context_type": "Analysis",
                "similarity_found": false,
                "linked_to": null,
                "similarity_score": null
            }
        ],
        "improved_author": "Harvard Law Review",
        "suggested_reeval_at": "2035-08-10 01:47:42"
    }
}
Database ID
108
UUID
9f973f1e-0a7d-4778-9880-6930468fe513
Submitted By User ID
7
Created At
August 9, 2025 at 6:04 AM
Updated At
August 10, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Original Content
<html lang="en-US" class="js" style="--main-margin-top: 84px;"><head>
		<meta charset="UTF-8">
		<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
				<!-- Google Tag Manager -->
		<script type="text/javascript" async="" src="//harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/matomo/matomo.js"></script><script async="" src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-M369FSP"></script><script>(function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M369FSP');</script>
		<!-- End Google Tag Manager -->
		<script>(function(html){html.className = html.className.replace(/\bno-js\b/,'js')})(document.documentElement);</script>
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow, max-image-preview:large, max-snippet:-1, max...

Processing Status Details

Detailed status of each processing step.

Parsing Status
Pending
Claim Extraction Status
Pending
AI Extraction Status
Pending

Claims from this Source (3)

All claims extracted from this source document.

Claim Management System - MVP