Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
Individuals who had high support for New Deal policies were more likely to support Court-packing.
- Simplified Text
-
Individuals who had high support for New Deal policies were more likely to support Court-packing
- Confidence Score
- 0.900
- Claim Maker
- Professor Alex Badas
- Context Type
- Legal Analysis
- Context Details
-
{ "finding": "individuals with high support for New Deal policies were more likely to support Court-packing", "researcher": "Professor Alex Badas" } - UUID
- a116404d-5a3d-42fe-901f-e71a4ee8ef39
- Vector Index
- âś— No vector
- Created
- February 15, 2026 at 3:30 PM (6 months ago)
- Last Updated
- February 15, 2026 at 3:30 PM (6 months ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
Completed
Analysis
166
claims
🔥
1 week ago
https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/confusion-and-clarity-in-the-case-for-supreme-court-reform/
This article analyzes the arguments for and against Supreme Court reform, focusing on formal and substantive disagreements. It examines historical precedents for reform and argues that the current movement stems from concerns about the Court's recent decisions.
Similar Claims (5)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
-
Simplified: Badas and Caldeira use responses from a 1937 Gallup survey that included questions about Court packing6 months ago
-
Simplified: Roosevelt and the Democratic Congress faced little political opposition to passing their legislative agenda but were consistently rebuked by the Supre...6 months ago
-
Simplified: President Roosevelt proposed bill that would add six new seats to the Court6 months ago
-
Simplified: Attempt to reform the Supreme Court occurred in the late 1930s6 months ago
-
Public support for the Supreme Court–packing plan diminished after Justice Van Devanter retired. 0.900Simplified: Public support for Supreme Court–packing plan diminished after Justice Van Devanter retired6 months ago