Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
See Robin Bradley Kar & Jason Mazzone, Essay, The Garland Affair: What History and the Constitution Really Say About President Obama’s Powers to Appoint a Replacement for Justice Scalia, 91 N.Y.U. L. Rev. Online 53, 55–58 (2016).
- Simplified Text
-
Robin Bradley Kar & Jason Mazzone wrote The Garland Affair What History and the Constitution Really Say About President Obama’s Powers to Appoint a Replacement for Justice Scalia in 91 N Y U L Rev Online 53 55–58 in 2016
- Confidence Score
- 1.000
- Claim Maker
- The author
- Context Type
- Legal Article
- Context Details
-
{ "page": "53", "year": "2016", "title": "The Garland Affair: What History and the Constitution Really Say About President Obama\u2019s Powers to Appoint a Replacement for Justice Scalia", "author": "Robin Bradley Kar & Jason Mazzone", "volume": "91", "journal": "N.Y.U. L. Rev. Online", "page_range": "55-58" } - UUID
- a1164052-8047-4031-b3c6-ebd531e0ec28
- Vector Index
- ✗ No vector
- Created
- February 15, 2026 at 3:30 PM (2 months ago)
- Last Updated
- February 15, 2026 at 3:30 PM (2 months ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
Completed
Analysis
166
claims
🔥
2 months ago
https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/confusion-and-clarity-in-the-case-for-supreme-court-reform/
This article analyzes the arguments for and against Supreme Court reform, focusing on formal and substantive disagreements. It examines historical precedents for reform and argues that the current movement stems from concerns about the Court's recent decisions.
Similar Claims (0)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
No similar claims found
This claim appears to be unique in the system.