Source Details

{
    "source_type": "extension",
    "content_hash": "9879b86ffaf3f941c1608b683f121117542cfb136d41d64e547bc0fc66bcbe36",
    "submitted_via": "chrome_extension",
    "extension_version": "1.0.18",
    "original_url": "https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/09\/24\/us\/riverside-county-california-sheriff-seized-ballots.html?emc=edit_na_20260924&nl=breaking-news&segment_id=227015",
    "parsed_content": "Trump AdministrationN.I.H. GrantsGreenland DealDefense of A.I.Voting by MailApproval RatingAdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTSupported bySKIP ADVERTISEMENTRepublican Sheriff Illegally Seized California Ballots, Court RulesThe California Supreme Court ordered Sheriff Chad Bianco of Riverside County to return ballots to election officials after he confiscated them for an investigation.Listen \u00b7 4:36 min Share full articleThe California Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a case examining whether Sheriff Chad Bianco of Riverside County legally seized ballots from a 2025 election.Credit...Noah Berger\/Associated PressBy Tim Arango and Soumya KarlamanglaTim Arango reported from Los Angeles and Soumya Karlamangla reported from San Francisco.Sept. 24, 2026Updated 2:09 p.m. ETSee more of our coverage in your search results.Encuentra m\u00e1s de nuestra cobertura en los resultados de b\u00fasqueda. Add The New York Times on GoogleAgrega The New York Times en Google The California Supreme Court on Thursday ordered a county sheriff to return about 650,000 ballots he seized from election officials as part of an investigation into voter fraud that state officials said had no basis in fact.The state\u2019s highest court in April had ordered Chad Bianco, the Republican sheriff of Riverside County, to halt his investigation as the court case challenging the seizure proceeded. The court determined on Thursday that Mr. Bianco had no authority to take the ballots cast in Riverside County during California\u2019s 2025 special election on congressional redistricting.The decision could have implications for the midterm elections in California: Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation last week that was intended to further block local officials from interfering in ballot counting.Mr. Bianco said he began his investigation after complaints by activists in the county that stretches from the suburbs east of Los Angeles to the Arizona border. They claimed that vote tallies during last year\u2019s special election did not match the ballots received. The supposed discrepancy, however, would not have affected the outcome of the vote.AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTCalifornia Supreme Court justices on Thursday issued unanimous decisions in two cases focusing on Mr. Bianco\u2019s investigation, determining that the seizure of the ballots was unlawful and threatened the integrity of elections in the state.\u201cI would underscore the seriousness of the violation here. This is not a case involving a few documents,\u201d wrote Associate Justice Goodwin H. Liu in a concurrent opinion published Thursday. \u201cIt involves the unlawful removal and handling by armed deputies of over 1,000 boxes of documents \u2014 and not just any documents, but the most precious documents of the citizenry in a democracy: their votes.\u201dThe investigation centered on an election in which voters overwhelmingly approved a plan to redraw congressional districts to favor Democrats. The proposal, known as Proposition 50, passed with 64 percent of the statewide electorate voting in favor.The gerrymander plan, backed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, was California\u2019s response to Texas\u2019s redrawing its district maps to improve the chances of Republicans winning more congressional seats.\u201cThe High Court for the state of California has spoken,\u201d Clarissa Cervantes, a Riverside city councilwoman and a plaintiff in one of the cases, said in a statement. \u201cThe rule of law has been upheld, and your sacred ballot and vote are constitutionally protected from any outside political interference.\u201dAdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTMr. Bianco was running for governor at the time he began his investigation. In June, he finished a distant fourth and failed to advance to the general election.Mr. Bianco did not immediately respond Thursday to a request for comment after the ruling.The justices heard arguments in San Francisco on Aug. 24 in the two cases brought against Mr. Bianco and his investigation: one by voters in Riverside County, the other by California\u2019s attorney general, Rob Bonta, a Democrat.During arguments, Mr. Bianco sat in the front row of the gallery, dressed in his khaki sheriff\u2019s uniform, with a gun holster on his belt.Speaking on the courthouse steps afterward, Mr. Bianco defended his right to seize the ballots and said he believed Mr. Bonta had illegally tried to impede his investigation into election fraud.\u201cThis is about an attorney general who believes that he can stop an investigatory process into something that he doesn\u2019t want us to know the answer to, and that was not the intention of our founding fathers,\u201d Mr. Bianco said. \u201cThat was not the intention of the writers of our Constitution.\u201dAdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTIn their decisions, the justices said that Mr. Bonta\u2019s orders had been lawful and Mr. Bianco, as a county sheriff, was required to follow the attorney general\u2019s orders to pause the investigation. Mr. Bonta, in his own remarks last month in the marble lobby of the courthouse, said, \u201cWhy are we here? Because we have a sheriff who seized 650,000 ballots, started opening and counting ballots, 12,500 of them, and it was unlawful.\u201d \u201cHe created a constitutional crisis in the process,\u201d Mr. Bonta added. \u201cHe acted in a rogue way, and most importantly, he acted unlawfully.\u201dAdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT",
    "published_at": "2026-09-24T17:38:24+00:00",
    "author_name": "Tim Arango, Soumya Karlamangla",
    "site_name": "The New York Times",
    "section": "US",
    "publisher": "The New York Times Company",
    "ai_headline": "Republican Sheriff Illegally Seized California Ballots, Court Rules",
    "ai_simplified_title": "California Supreme Court Rules Sheriff Illegally Seized Ballots",
    "ai_excerpt": "The California Supreme Court ordered Sheriff Chad Bianco of Riverside County to return ballots he illegally seized during an investigation into alleged voter fraud. The court ruled Bianco had no authority to take the ballots, threatening election integrity.",
    "ai_subject_tags": [
        "California Supreme Court",
        "Chad Bianco",
        "Riverside County",
        "Election Integrity",
        "Voter Fraud",
        "Ballot Seizure",
        "Gavin Newsom",
        "Rob Bonta"
    ],
    "ai_context_type": "News",
    "ai_context_details": {
        "tone": "informative",
        "perspective": "neutral",
        "audience": "general",
        "credibility_indicators": [
            "expert_quotes",
            "data_cited"
        ]
    },
    "ai_source_vector": null,
    "ai_confidence_score": 0.9999999999999999,
    "ai_extraction_metadata": {
        "extracted_at": "2026-09-25T03:01:42.516678Z",
        "ai_model": "gemini-2.5-flash",
        "extraction_method": "automated",
        "content_length": 5339,
        "metadata_prompt_body_chars": 5339,
        "metadata_prompt_truncated": false,
        "url": "https:\/\/nytimes.com\/2026\/09\/24\/us\/riverside-county-california-sheriff-seized-ballots.html",
        "existing_metadata": {
            "author_name": "Tim Arango, Soumya Karlamangla",
            "published_at": "2026-09-24T17:38:24.000000Z",
            "domain_name": "nytimes.com",
            "site_name": "The New York Times",
            "section": "US",
            "publisher": "The New York Times Company"
        },
        "openai_refusal_gemini_fallback": false
    }
}

{
    "extracted_at": "2026-09-25T03:01:42.516678Z",
    "ai_model": "gemini-2.5-flash",
    "extraction_method": "automated",
    "content_length": 5339,
    "metadata_prompt_body_chars": 5339,
    "metadata_prompt_truncated": false,
    "url": "https:\/\/nytimes.com\/2026\/09\/24\/us\/riverside-county-california-sheriff-seized-ballots.html",
    "existing_metadata": {
        "author_name": "Tim Arango, Soumya Karlamangla",
        "published_at": "2026-09-24T17:38:24.000000Z",
        "domain_name": "nytimes.com",
        "site_name": "The New York Times",
        "section": "US",
        "publisher": "The New York Times Company"
    },
    "openai_refusal_gemini_fallback": false
}