Source Details

{
    "source_type": "extension",
    "content_hash": "2a3c42893bb71342555934a52a2aab8bf72215e51f0d49b3d08b798e9a7c2103",
    "submitted_via": "chrome_extension",
    "extension_version": "1.0.18",
    "original_url": "https:\/\/www.pcmag.com\/comparisons\/chatgpt-vs-claude-ive-tested-them-both-and-ones-clearly-more-powerful?test_uuid=04IpBmWGZleS0I0J3epvMrC&test_variant=B",
    "parsed_content": "Table of Contents\n \n \n Table of Contents\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n If you\u2019re ready to dip your toes into the world of AI chatbots, ChatGPT and Claude are two of the best to start with. The former is our current Editors' Choice winner, and the latter is our readers' favorite. Although both are impressive in their own ways, they are more different than you might realize. ChatGPT, for example, can generate images and videos, while Claude does an especially good job of protecting users' privacy. But that's far from everything that makes them unique. I\u2019ve reviewed both chatbots, and I\u2019m here to compare them across a variety of key categories to help you choose the best one for your needs.\n \n \n \n Full Specs\n \n \n \n \n \n PriceBoth ChatGPT and Claude have free and paid versions. Free versions limit your access to features, models, and usage, while paid versions start at $17 per month (billed annually) for Claude Pro, and $20 per month for ChatGPT Plus.\u00a0ChatGPT offers more features for free, such as access to deep research. Also, both its free and paid versions have features that Claude doesn\u2019t support at all, such as image and video generation. That said, Claude has an app-creation feature and can integrate with Google Workspace apps, things ChatGPT can't do.Higher-level plans for ChatGPT and Claude primarily increase usage limits. ChatGPT locks some features behind these tiers, such as access to its o3-pro model, but these are generally not relevant to consumers. And I don't think most people are willing to shell out the $200 per month for the top-of-the-line ChatGPT Pro tier. The situation with Claude is similar. The Max plan promises \u201cearly access to advanced Claude features,\u201d but these aren\u2019t always available and likely aren't relevant to the average person. Claude, however, does split its Max plan into two versions: 5x more usage than its Pro plan for $100 per month (billed annually) and 20x more usage for $200 per month (billed annually).Winner: TiePlatformsBoth ChatGPT and Claude are accessible on the web, as well as via desktop (macOS and Windows) and mobile (Android, iOS, and iPadOS) apps. An official Google Chrome extension is available for ChatGPT, but only unofficial ones are available for Claude.You can access the models of either chatbot in other places, such as ChatGPT in Siri, or Claude in Perplexity. However, you get the most features via their official apps and sites.\n \n \n \nChatGPT and Claude have similar interfaces that are consistent and easy to use across platforms. Neither overwhelms you with long lists of settings or toggles. However, Claude\u2019s user experience stands out for its pleasing aesthetics and innovative features, such as easy access to generated content, such as apps, creative writing, and reports, as well as to deep research statistics.Winner: ClaudeAI ModelsChatGPT has two central lines of models: the 4-series (its conversational, all-purpose line) and the o-series (its complex reasoning line). Claude has a similar setup with its Sonnet (conversational) and Opus (complex reasoning) lines.\u00a0Claude\u2019s latest models are Opus 4 and Sonnet 4, while ChatGPT\u2019s latest is o3-pro. As mentioned, however, you aren't likely to use o3-pro, since it requires a pricey ChatGPT Pro plan. Most of the time, you\u2019ll end up using the 4-series and Sonnet, swapping over to either the o-series or Opus when you need to tackle more complicated tasks.Below, you can see how these models handle a variety of different prompts.Winner: TieWeb SearchNeither ChatGPT nor Claude has trouble searching the web for up-to-date information. ChatGPT tends to fare better with tough queries and is slightly faster on average, but the biggest difference comes down to sourcing. ChatGPT highlights relevant portions of its responses when you hover your cursor over a source, making it easy to connect claims to evidence, and source icons show the name of the source. Claude doesn\u2019t highlight parts of its responses, and its source icons show the name of the source article, which is less useful at a glance for determining its trustworthiness.\nClaude also can\u2019t display images alongside web search results, which ChatGPT does automatically. ChatGPT also has a shopping feature that lets you ask for buying advice and presents clickable tiles with links to retailers and other relevant information. You can ask Claude for help with shopping, but it won't provide anything comparable.Winner: ChatGPTDeep ResearchBoth ChatGPT and Claude can generate research reports with lots of sources on just about any topic. The actual depth of the research is what separates the two. Even though Claude tends to perform more searches, its final reports often don\u2019t go into as much detail and end up much shorter than ChatGPT\u2019s. The flip side is that Claude can research more quickly than ChatGPT.Both chatbots ask follow-up questions before starting their research and handle sourcing well with in-text citations. They display useful stats, such as total research time, total searches, and total sources, too, but Claude goes a step further with convenient visualization of its searches by website. Of course, this also highlights Claude\u2019s tendency to perform far more searches than sources it cites. Whereas Claude relegates its reports to a panel on the side of the screen, ChatGPT presents them more directly in its central chat window.Claude and ChatGPT take a different tone in reports, too. ChatGPT is more casual, and its reports read like elaborate forum posts. Claude is more direct and slightly stiffer, making its responses read more like essays. Considering the brevity of Claude's reports, its tone feels a bit inconsistent. Of course, you might prefer one style over the other.\u00a0Winner: ChatGPTImage GenerationChatGPT\u2019s image generation feature might not be perfect, but it's still among the best available. It routinely provides images with fewer errors and less distortion than competitors. ChatGPT impresses even with complicated prompts, such as generating diagrams or maintaining a narrative across comic panels. Claude can't generate images at all. Below is a diagram that ChatGPT generated.\n A ChatGPT-generated diagram (Credit: OpenAI\/PCMag)\nWinner: ChatGPTVideo GenerationSora video generation is available to ChatGPT Plus subscribers. Sora isn\u2019t quite as advanced as Gemini\u2019s Veo 3 model, which can even produce audio to accompany videos. But you can still generate lifelike videos with it, assuming you spend the time to get your prompts just right and iterate enough. Claude can\u2019t generate videos, as mentioned.Winner: ChatGPT\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Get Our Best Stories!\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Email\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Thanks for signing up!\n Your subscription has been confirmed. Keep an eye on your inbox!\n \n \n \nFile ProcessingYou can upload files to ChatGPT and Claude for analysis and image recognition, meaning they can critique resumes, help parse textbooks, and identify animals and plants, among many other things. ChatGPT does a good job of understanding images, identifying more components within a computer than other chatbots. Claude struggles with the same task. With documents, though, both prove capable of answering questions about lengthy product manuals without issue. However, both occasionally hallucinate and make up quotes.Winner: ChatGPTCreative WritingWhether you want to generate monologues, plays, speeches, or stories, ChatGPT and Claude are competent creative writers. Responses from them don\u2019t feel quite as repetitive as from Gemini, and they\u2019re distinct from each other, too.\u00a0I thoroughly appreciate how Claude generates its creative writing as Artifacts, which are clickable tiles that open up in a side panel. This allows creative writing, like poetry, to maintain consistent line breaks and spacing across different displays. It also enables you to read Claude\u2019s response while referring to the accompanying message it sends that explains why it made certain choices. ChatGPT doesn\u2019t format its creative writing similarly, nor does it send accompanying explanations.\n \n \n \nI prompted ChatGPT (first slide) and Claude (second slide) with the following: \"Without referencing anything in your memory or prior responses, I want you to write me a free verse poem. Pay special attention to capitalization, enjambment, line breaks, and punctuation. Since it's free verse, I don't want a familiar meter or ABAB rhyming scheme, but I want it to have a cohesive style or underlying beat.\u201d Both chatbots delivered what I asked and even included titles.Winner: ClaudeComplex ReasoningThe dedicated complex reasoning models of Claude and ChatGPT are capable, but the former is slightly more consistent. ChatGPT also doesn\u2019t need to rely on an extended thinking mode (like Claude does) to answer computer science, math, and physics questions correctly. (This extended thinking mode is inconsistent; sometimes, it causes Claude to answer a question incorrectly that it otherwise wouldn't.) Both perform well in general, even though they can and will make mistakes.Both chatbots can code, but that\u2019s outside the scope of this article. However, you can still test a chatbot\u2019s coding ability for yourself. You can also enjoy Claude\u2019s coding skills directly if you use its app creation feature, which doesn\u2019t require any prior programming knowledge.\n \n Recommended by Our Editors\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nWinner: ChatGPTApp BuildingOne of Claude\u2019s unique and most interesting features is its ability to build apps for you: Simply describe what you want, and Claude codes it. \n A custom app I made with Claude (Credit: Anthropic\/PCMag)\nOf course, this capability has a bunch of limitations. For example, you can make only web apps with basic functionality. Furthermore, the actual creation process can be cumbersome and require a good deal of prompting to get right. Nonetheless, it\u2019s an exciting feature that I expect to improve over time. ChatGPT doesn\u2019t have anything similar.Winner: ClaudeIntegrationsClaude has a ton of different integrations, like with Google Workspace apps, such as Calendar, Drive, and Gmail. These integrations are still in beta, so I expect them to improve. They aren't as robust as those you get with Gemini, but Claude can still access Drive files, consult your schedule, and reference emails. Beyond just Google apps, Claude can connect to a variety of other services, from Notion to PayPal, both through the web and locally via desktop extensions. ChatGPT doesn\u2019t offer comparable functionality.Winner: ClaudeAI AssistantsChatGPT has Custom GPTs, which are customizable AI assistants. These don't necessarily offer a big advantage over just using ChatGPT directly, but third-party Custom GPTs do introduce new functionality, such as easy access to Canva for editing images you generate or WolframAlpha for solving equations. You can allow Custom GPTs to access outside information and take outside actions, too. Claude can't match ChatGPT here.Winner: ChatGPTContext Windows and Usage CapsChatGPT\u2019s context window goes up to 128,000 tokens for its top plans, while Claude\u2019s context window tops out at 200,000 tokens for paid users. Both chatbots have dynamic usage caps, depending on server load, but you can expect to send at least 80 messages over three hours with ChatGPT Plus and 45 messages over five hours with Claude Pro. Higher-end plans for both chatbots increase these limits. Anecdotally, I didn\u2019t hit usage limits when testing either's premium tiers.\u00a0Winner: TiePrivacyChatGPT\u2019s approach to privacy is a mixed bag. Like all chatbots, OpenAI collects a variety of data, including all your chats, and it uses that data to train its models by default. However, you can choose to turn training off, and OpenAI promises not to sell your data or use it for targeted ads.Anthropic emphasizes privacy more. Although it still collects some user data, it doesn\u2019t use it to train its models by default. It also gets rid of conversations automatically after 30 days and makes deleting them manually easy.\u00a0Both companies have experienced data leaks and scandals in the past, so neither is perfect. However, there\u2019s good reason to trust Anthropic over OpenAI, nonetheless.Winner: ClaudeDisclosure: Ziff Davis, PCMag's parent company, filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in April 2025, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.\n \n \n \n \n \n And The Winner Is...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 4.0\n Excellent\n \n \n \n \n ChatGPT and Claude are both top-tier chatbots with generally competent performance and robust feature sets. Thanks to a few more features, like image and video generation, and best-in-class response accuracy and detail, ChatGPT is my top pick overall. But there are valid reasons to use Claude instead. For example, Claude\u2019s app maker is a unique feature worth trying, and its conscientious approach to privacy is admirable.\n \n Get It Now\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learn More\n ChatGPT Review\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n About Our Expert",
    "ai_headline": "ChatGPT vs. Claude: I\u2019ve tested them both, and one\u2019s clearly more powerful",
    "ai_simplified_title": "PCMag Compares ChatGPT and Claude AI Chatbots",
    "ai_excerpt": "PCMag reviews and compares the AI chatbots ChatGPT and Claude across various categories. The article highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each, including features, pricing, and performance in tasks like image generation and creative writing.",
    "ai_subject_tags": [
        "Artificial Intelligence",
        "AI Chatbots",
        "ChatGPT",
        "Claude",
        "Product Review",
        "Technology"
    ],
    "ai_context_type": "Review",
    "ai_context_details": {
        "tone": "informative",
        "perspective": "neutral",
        "audience": "general",
        "credibility_indicators": [
            "expert_review",
            "product_comparison"
        ]
    },
    "ai_source_vector": [
        0.00852896,
        0.0008130344,
        0.004875119,
        -0.079694495,
        -0.008733416,
        0.0018396014,
        0.00956604,
        0.012243239,
        -0.0042407867,
        -0.0053916243,
        -0.044804063,
        -0.022249226,
        0.024504881,
        -0.031562965,
        0.10914337,
        0.003348702,
        -0.0056621535,
        0.0022285203,
        0.01874212,
        0.006976298,
        0.04317902,
        0.008476672,
        0.021570653,
        0.0034225043,
        -0.0038003975,
        0.00041675256,
        0.026853945,
        0.001134509,
        0.040923987,
        0.02329926,
        -0.014189797,
        -0.012567638,
        -0.02614255,
        0.007217289,
        -0.005016003,
        0.038590595,
        0.020175606,
        -0.005970686,
        -0.0028734396,
        0.012101427,
        -0.026782235,
        -0.021831969,
        0.0039118887,
        0.011822753,
        0.0044023786,
        -0.020456651,
        0.016394569,
        -0.026551286,
        0.011845345,
        0.010362084,
        0.0022253282,
        0.0011441534,
        -0.021326168,
        -0.17470108,
        -0.014092974,
        -0.016778018,
        -0.020769801,
        0.01616369,
        0.015633987,
        -0.0044498662,
        -0.0037483983,
        0.022334645,
        -0.038269706,
        -0.0044182036,
        -0.009996682,
        -0.01386061,
        0.0150227025,
        -0.01434486,
        0.00409193,
        0.010485029,
        0.0015755077,
        0.017468706,
        -0.0069710054,
        0.0006831017,
        0.0023980397,
        -0.022489684,
        -0.007577451,
        0.018270573,
        0.014212145,
        0.019303452,
        0.017143061,
        -0.001786475,
        0.018705644,
        -0.0007248062,
        -0.02010093,
        -0.008248582,
        0.011724066,
        0.0022675137,
        0.016437756,
        -0.043084912,
        0.0066351504,
        0.011621567,
        0.013550167,
        0.00026596015,
        0.032857843,
        -0.008697179,
        -0.019266061,
        0.012956853,
        0.005865563,
        0.011478855,
        -0.006831359,
        -0.018301843,
        0.00031707968,
        0.0001235074,
        0.028443316,
        -0.022180052,
        -0.018612185,
        -0.0077316775,
        -0.013272581,
        -0.00085916946,
        0.018730937,
        0.0026553916,
        0.0063986345,
        0.023899922,
        0.0063659474,
        -0.14638491,
        -0.02066794,
        -0.007828251,
        -0.01201939,
        -0.009383579,
        -0.0034951358,
        -0.0005776334,
        0.03753822,
        0.0082816435,
        -0.016486721,
        -0.009068064,
        -0.010731508,
        -0.011224478,
        -0.01153832,
        0.038734514,
        -0.02078882,
        -0.013821918,
        0.0024314201,
        -0.015257851,
        0.0106059415,
        0.024691522,
        0.017129228,
        0.011076856,
        -0.0064637526,
        -0.014317822,
        0.007134743,
        0.011943285,
        0.00093956996,
        0.0034881553,
        -0.018231759,
        -0.015674116,
        -0.0256288,
        0.026887393,
        0.0021138813,
        -0.017540615,
        0.010929806,
        -0.0059374245,
        -0.03618953,
        0.03327171,
        0.011673427,
        -0.02786057,
        -0.0053876294,
        0.014553648,
        0.012151158,
        -0.0080396,
        0.008229184,
        -0.0069268937,
        -0.02588732,
        0.014227654,
        -0.003924016,
        0.007183438,
        -0.016613672,
        0.006023737,
        0.020782115,
        0.020488584,
        0.015269385,
        -0.007813536,
        -0.004495066,
        0.0015252786,
        -0.012183792,
        0.00296779,
        0.045537002,
        -0.003244049,
        -0.006756418,
        -0.00389147,
        0.007257343,
        0.016848698,
        0.003251393,
        -0.027586825,
        -0.000359474,
        0.0032259775,
        -9.608024e-5,
        0.012302555,
        0.023289666,
        -0.007533885,
        -0.015861036,
        -0.029658338,
        0.011403918,
        -0.017303288,
        0.0028211318,
        -0.0143209575,
        -0.01715301,
        0.005227443,
        0.0024372821,
        0.016599074,
        0.010726856,
        -0.021554854,
        -0.00724234,
        -0.030224904,
        -0.011005224,
        -0.011734206,
        -0.03386554,
        -0.01794087,
        0.009686581,
        -0.034838952,
        0.012032747,
        -0.0049644103,
        0.010751526,
        -0.022435566,
        0.014988904,
        -0.0065429863,
        -0.011653236,
        -0.043252595,
        -0.008011501,
        -0.033227656,
        -0.008960049,
        -0.0018175893,
        -0.012357603,
        0.039160796,
        -0.0024110372,
        0.01633832,
        0.02322535,
        -0.004666054,
        0.024813432,
        0.037482183,
        0.016353065,
        0.017940694,
        0.0024518403,
        -0.020354403,
        0.013898967,
        -0.025870226,
        -0.01191539,
        0.010035031,
        0.009222187,
        0.016443763,
        -0.008842062,
        -0.008233483,
        0.00519544,
        0.034024794,
        0.026515363,
        -0.015127152,
        0.003724668,
        -0.011394844,
        -0.004577156,
        0.00459345,
        0.011673206,
        -0.020093769,
        0.004161798,
        -0.01913028,
        -0.010434636,
        0.008215268,
        -0.014814954,
        0.0041750446,
        -0.0172916,
        -0.0371726,
        0.012601433,
        0.030680573,
        -0.003597608,
        -0.012693294,
        0.021359148,
        0.009962907,
        0.0033433463,
        0.012485959,
        -0.01845718,
        0.0029566565,
        -0.005800118,
        -0.007219169,
        -0.012492216,
        -0.018501889,
        -0.0036067602,
        -0.02153663,
        -0.06741139,
        0.010165398,
        0.008213038,
        -0.008842768,
        0.010992829,
        0.030485256,
        -0.004955747,
        0.011969422,
        -0.022100454,
        0.039281085,
        0.0032866907,
        0.010640957,
        0.009338713,
        -0.017946959,
        0.011102633,
        0.013891784,
        -0.0059905685,
        -0.0039336057,
        0.0051169354,
        -0.030344602,
        -0.006366741,
        0.01099088,
        -0.0006467606,
        -0.017206311,
        -0.0056588887,
        0.006931394,
        0.012048237,
        0.032081734,
        -0.031649716,
        0.0162085,
        -0.009919974,
        0.0140259275,
        -0.03058827,
        -0.004702648,
        -0.016792879,
        -0.0064516272,
        0.005649765,
        -0.0016910662,
        -0.005071541,
        -0.00899631,
        -0.0019371591,
        -0.008912485,
        -0.024108982,
        -0.016244559,
        -0.0015024489,
        2.3244713e-5,
        -0.011670805,
        -0.0012170663,
        0.002888085,
        0.000255875,
        0.0074273595,
        -0.013982862,
        0.02121402,
        0.003389313,
        0.005124828,
        -0.016922385,
        0.021146273,
        -0.005595799,
        0.008684827,
        -5.4435972e-5,
        0.022223674,
        0.008413079,
        0.006740302,
        0.0011504099,
        0.00987333,
        -0.003297239,
        -0.008297797,
        -0.0015680031,
        -0.013619659,
        0.0023859374,
        0.030974966,
        -0.008639221,
        -0.01400228,
        -0.018244078,
        0.0080280695,
        -0.024566786,
        -0.00418168,
        -0.02244208,
        -0.022428704,
        0.018862,
        0.010719713,
        0.0034945516,
        0.020790325,
        0.006248168,
        0.0024652472,
        0.0045848973,
        -0.008822666,
        -0.0049440158,
        -0.004110194,
        -0.01792223,
        -0.0046465877,
        0.0007282064,
        0.0063615413,
        0.013090603,
        0.0044118715,
        0.0009088185,
        -0.016674256,
        -0.008259713,
        0.0080377655,
        0.00014071017,
        -0.013110669,
        -0.003991168,
        0.008677846,
        0.032711595,
        -0.024022456,
        0.037556596,
        0.00028782108,
        -0.0105075855,
        -0.013743517,
        0.0051600863,
        0.024649788,
        -0.0007762865,
        0.0070429756,
        0.008529222,
        0.006155154,
        0.018136567,
        -0.008483866,
        0.014402365,
        -0.009198239,
        0.0010955924,
        -0.006443921,
        -0.003523101,
        -0.036233403,
        -0.009996809,
        -0.0024555228,
        -0.0018218854,
        -0.0150938565,
        0.008330744,
        0.014128991,
        0.013688298,
        0.010831238,
        0.011840455,
        0.006394313,
        0.0022358939,
        0.0063182767,
        0.009703777,
        0.01565699,
        0.0086441655,
        0.014671318,
        0.01866667,
        0.012564356,
        0.020060632,
        0.00995051,
        -0.0017536781,
        -0.027659934,
        0.01910118,
        -0.006694225,
        0.019378778,
        0.01234083,
        0.009107728,
        -0.025933836,
        -0.03477664,
        0.02040889,
        -0.011425661,
        0.017343897,
        -0.006360186,
        -0.015598891,
        -0.021404035,
        -0.023227004,
        0.0011478744,
        -0.0029647395,
        -0.024383543,
        0.016949067,
        -0.03292226,
        0.010776001,
        0.00026405146,
        0.0076954532,
        0.0051659015,
        0.023072366,
        -0.0041698427,
        -0.0013218797,
        -0.008484645,
        -0.029337216,
        -0.013082109,
        0.015717605,
        -0.007539164,
        0.011272317,
        -0.027930846,
        -0.007575512,
        -0.006729469,
        0.0040130764,
        0.010990983,
        0.0016756984,
        -0.03833815,
        -0.0007075588,
        0.016233241,
        0.002583387,
        0.0052205618,
        0.016836401,
        -0.007053798,
        -0.011098901,
        0.0044089085,
        0.0051199365,
        0.013820971,
        0.004104712,
        0.029455068,
        0.027906165,
        0.01751204,
        -0.015091778,
        -0.019094152,
        -0.014848688,
        -0.022653557,
        0.010909163,
        0.02099407,
        0.010657456,
        0.015798766,
        -0.016628552,
        0.0041536316,
        0.014468505,
        0.02648143,
        -0.008461409,
        -0.002265097,
        0.0059699486,
        -0.0024441322,
        0.019382838,
        0.021204097,
        0.0046458524,
        0.015670022,
        0.00053371774,
        -0.027057193,
        -0.014001417,
        -0.018689526,
        -0.024348041,
        0.00877888,
        0.017092075,
        -0.028172633,
        -0.008649416,
        0.02977038,
        -0.019063076,
        -0.022613818,
        0.0035287265,
        0.004833823,
        -0.01996024,
        0.010618403,
        -0.0115500055,
        -0.005448278,
        0.04433121,
        -0.01068524,
        -0.012551706,
        -0.00758254,
        -0.006885439,
        -0.024363358,
        -0.018401854,
        -0.015343992,
        -0.030755758,
        0.011138368,
        0.01803019,
        -0.016093438,
        -0.004925095,
        0.006592953,
        0.0040579713,
        -0.0024064344,
        0.029286874,
        0.020093411,
        -0.014838925,
        -0.02210557,
        0.008949422,
        -0.015928835,
        0.0055694645,
        -0.015595894,
        0.04414559,
        0.016004859,
        0.013357856,
        -0.038513884,
        -0.011584256,
        -0.0076024593,
        -0.044453178,
        0.007429033,
        0.0014526343,
        -0.096059956,
        0.0025284747,
        0.0006115304,
        0.008227855,
        0.022467908,
        -0.020939019,
        0.01591414,
        -0.014064847,
        -0.009877083,
        -0.0055725,
        0.021804748,
        0.0023708344,
        0.017522132,
        0.016425926,
        0.023931347,
        -0.004753192,
        -0.0072663804,
        -0.012512559,
        0.008494605,
        -0.028334204,
        0.009804393,
        -0.038089797,
        0.008095477,
        -0.009671316,
        -0.0052026296,
        -0.007671619,
        0.0052511245,
        -0.012293055,
        -0.0066723493,
        0.006419275,
        -0.014018376,
        0.011870097,
        -0.0036849459,
        0.023318755,
        -0.010905005,
        -0.024088139,
        -0.0007238058,
        -0.005554077,
        0.023891002,
        0.015176112,
        0.01678124,
        0.001648097,
        0.013626805,
        -0.009898976,
        0.0016676704,
        0.009652538,
        0.013777235,
        -0.0065739565,
        0.013922229,
        0.01028666,
        -0.041775923,
        -0.0008373055,
        -0.027579183,
        -0.039818652,
        -0.013960147,
        0.00706886,
        -0.030532328,
        -0.0074333996,
        -0.006596902,
        -0.008706455,
        -0.011596335,
        -0.008055288,
        0.016320085,
        0.029225174,
        -0.0207492,
        0.022942828,
        -0.016662778,
        0.046942562,
        0.01763937,
        0.0071186246,
        0.0062733046,
        0.0026132613,
        0.01410083,
        0.020461654,
        -0.014468504,
        -0.0030627388,
        -0.0113817565,
        0.024262948,
        -0.006248547,
        -0.0027596082,
        0.009656897,
        -0.02108978,
        -0.07298991,
        -0.04167951,
        0.01341565,
        -0.0016902132,
        -0.012699146,
        0.0029085914,
        -0.0029064547,
        -0.014067338,
        0.047822796,
        -0.0074637504,
        -0.0019334377,
        0.0026002934,
        0.0011105282,
        -0.026743688,
        0.0031138053,
        0.0075624124,
        0.021121051,
        0.011445237,
        0.038413327,
        -0.027644765,
        -0.005177303,
        -0.018451113,
        0.018711979,
        -0.020312065,
        -0.022054104,
        0.007991603,
        -0.0232828,
        0.007558211,
        0.014834,
        0.0015341252,
        0.0060276426,
        -0.15696935,
        -0.018360434,
        0.025808997,
        0.00565444,
        0.010699146,
        0.004544837,
        -0.016120961,
        0.036564793,
        -0.0033036934,
        0.0023826957,
        -0.006743958,
        -0.033073384,
        -0.044113237,
        0.027124504,
        -0.008036027,
        0.121605344,
        -0.0041658804,
        0.023480907,
        -0.020223869,
        0.006591753,
        0.0113118,
        -0.009565216,
        -0.004648199,
        0.010937126,
        0.0100502,
        -0.007616864,
        0.024695912,
        0.014663846,
        0.012319106,
        0.019061638,
        0.031649925,
        0.0066097598,
        0.01209785,
        -0.0019877688,
        0.014460479,
        -0.02127607,
        0.008378535,
        -0.0018568543,
        -0.003392804,
        0.003301985,
        0.03388531,
        0.02403786,
        -0.008741162,
        -0.006865446,
        -0.012600838,
        -0.016196588,
        -0.024510927,
        -0.0029989479,
        0.0069447258,
        -0.0040988135,
        -0.032826245,
        -0.055021584,
        0.023714608,
        0.002852748,
        0.010794884,
        0.021622565,
        -0.0066478187,
        -0.0064688693,
        0.012667937,
        -0.0025799558,
        -0.008346707,
        0.02701176,
        -0.021770047,
        0.0074900337,
        -0.025438746,
        0.009742035,
        0.013444916,
        0.03700688,
        -0.010219995,
        0.0031424796,
        0.010516078,
        0.0017262897,
        -0.011701534,
        -0.004791702,
        0.015069903,
        -0.00413539,
        -0.010054732,
        0.017474804,
        0.003408878,
        -0.0056203953,
        0.008947163,
        -0.011818038,
        0.0019138748,
        -0.027024377,
        0.03775666,
        0.002435386,
        -0.008679582,
        -0.00678194,
        0.007873363,
        -0.018363696,
        0.018352227,
        0.026944803,
        -0.011691111,
        0.013010822,
        -0.0035944933,
        0.016471758,
        0.025723033,
        -0.016143663,
        0.011427889,
        -0.012102812,
        -0.015826618,
        0.015411586,
        -0.009093576,
        -0.0047372086,
        0.0013320792,
        0.004647694,
        0.028060464,
        0.014301656,
        0.014637378,
        -0.0035061843
    ],
    "ai_confidence_score": 0.9999999999999999,
    "ai_extraction_metadata": {
        "extracted_at": "2026-02-15T17:24:37.358110Z",
        "ai_model": "gemini-2.0-flash-lite",
        "extraction_method": "automated",
        "content_length": 13103,
        "url": "https:\/\/pcmag.com\/comparisons\/chatgpt-vs-claude-ive-tested-them-both-and-ones-clearly-more-powerful",
        "existing_metadata": {
            "author_name": null,
            "published_at": null,
            "domain_name": null,
            "site_name": null,
            "section": null,
            "publisher": null
        }
    }
}

{
    "extracted_at": "2026-02-15T17:24:37.358110Z",
    "ai_model": "gemini-2.0-flash-lite",
    "extraction_method": "automated",
    "content_length": 13103,
    "url": "https:\/\/pcmag.com\/comparisons\/chatgpt-vs-claude-ive-tested-them-both-and-ones-clearly-more-powerful",
    "existing_metadata": {
        "author_name": null,
        "published_at": null,
        "domain_name": null,
        "site_name": null,
        "section": null,
        "publisher": null
    }
}