Source Details

{
    "source_type": "extension",
    "content_hash": "8c249b4355debdff38f4f1293c26b42c989d65fb11a30fdc82555f020bae8b48",
    "submitted_via": "chrome_extension",
    "extension_version": "1.0.18",
    "original_url": "https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/09\/16\/us\/politics\/leon-black-contempt-congress.html?ae=oa&emc=edit_nn_20260917&nl=the-morning&segment_id=226633",
    "parsed_content": "Trump AdministrationDefense of A.I.How Trump Stifles SpeechVoting by MailApproval RatingAdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTSupported bySKIP ADVERTISEMENTHouse Holds Leon Black in Contempt Over Epstein SubpoenasThe billionaire investor had refused to appear for a deposition and turn over documents to a key panel investigating Jeffrey Epstein.Listen \u00b7 4:07 min Share full articleThe House Oversight Committee issued subpoenas to Leon Black in June, after he refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements that he had signed with women, some of whom had been linked to Jeffrey Epstein.Credit...Yolanda Ruiz\/ZUMA Press Wire, ReutersBy Michael GoldReporting from the CapitolSept. 16, 2026See more of our coverage in your search results.Encuentra m\u00e1s de nuestra cobertura en los resultados de b\u00fasqueda. Add The New York Times on GoogleAgrega The New York Times en Google The House on Wednesday unanimously agreed to hold the billionaire investor Leon Black in criminal contempt of Congress after he refused to appear for a deposition and turn over documents to a key panel investigating the disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.The citation, agreed to without a recorded vote, amounts to an official recommendation that the Justice Department bring federal charges against Mr. Black. It may serve to refocus public attention on the Trump administration\u2019s handling of investigative material related to Mr. Epstein just as lawmakers depart Washington for a final spate of campaigning before the midterm congressional elections.While President Trump has labored to avoid discussing the Epstein matter and excoriated those clamoring for more transparency, Republicans in Congress have tried to show they take the case, which has generated outrage among their core supporters, seriously.The House Oversight Committee issued subpoenas to Mr. Black in June, after he refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements that he had signed with women, some of whom had been linked to Mr. Epstein. The panel demanded that he appear for a deposition and provide copies of any nondisclosure agreements he might have entered into. Mr. Black refused to comply and instead sued the committee, accusing it of exceeding its authority.AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe committee on Tuesday unanimously recommended holding Mr. Black in contempt. Representative James R. Comer, Republican of Kentucky and the panel\u2019s chairman, accused him of using the lawsuit as cover.\u201cMr. Black is hiding behind litigation to delay having to provide answers to the American people,\u201d he said on Tuesday. \u201cNo one is above the law. Mr. Black will be treated the same as anyone else in this investigation, and his actions have consequences.\u201dSign up for the On Politics newsletter. It's a pivotal moment for American politics. Join us for 2026 and beyond. Get it sent to your inbox.Representative Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the committee, said in an interview that Mr. Black had clearly violated two subpoenas.\u201cSubpoenas have to mean something in the Congress,\u201d he said. \u201cWhen you give $180 million to Jeffrey Epstein and are unwilling to answer questions about why and where and how you were involved? I think that\u2019s a huge, huge issue.\u201dMr. Black\u2019s lawyers, Susan Estrich and Aaron Cutler, criticized the contempt vote in a statement, saying that Mr. Comer\u2019s actions were \u201cpolitically motivated and completely retaliatory.\u201d They said that Mr. Black had already provided the committee with the \u201conly confidentiality agreement\u201d that was relevant to its investigation. They also said they had filed an ethics complaint against Mr. Comer, though they declined to specify what offenses they believed he had committed.AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTMr. Black\u2019s lawsuit said that the Oversight Committee\u2019s subpoenas were \u201cinvalid\u201d and that unnamed women and others \u201cwhom he has or may have agreements\u201d with had \u201cbargained for confidentiality.\u201d Those people \u201cwant no association with the Epstein scandal,\u201d the lawsuit said.Mr. Black paid Mr. Epstein $170 million from 2013 to 2017 for what he described as traditional tax and estate planning services, according to congressional records and government documents.Mr. Black has repeatedly said he knew nothing about Mr. Epstein\u2019s decades-long sexual abuse of teenage girls and young women. But the release of millions of pages of emails and documents by the Justice Department put a new focus on Mr. Epstein\u2019s relationship with Mr. Black.Mr. Epstein advised Mr. Black on how to address issues he faced with several women with whom Mr. Black had sexual affairs. And Mr. Black paid about $20 million to a dozen women, according to the files and notes taken by congressional investigators that were previously shared with The New York Times.AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT",
    "published_at": "2026-09-16T19:09:47+00:00",
    "author_name": "Michael Gold",
    "site_name": "The New York Times",
    "section": "Politics",
    "publisher": "The New York Times Company",
    "ai_headline": "House Holds Leon Black in Contempt Over Epstein Subpoenas",
    "ai_simplified_title": "House holds Leon Black in contempt over Epstein subpoenas",
    "ai_excerpt": "The House unanimously agreed to hold billionaire investor Leon Black in criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to appear for a deposition and turn over documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. This recommendation to the Justice Department refocuses attention on the Trump administration's handling of Epstein-related investigations.",
    "ai_subject_tags": [
        "Leon Black",
        "Jeffrey Epstein",
        "House Oversight Committee",
        "Contempt of Congress",
        "Subpoenas",
        "Nondisclosure Agreements",
        "Trump Administration",
        "Politics"
    ],
    "ai_context_type": "News",
    "ai_context_details": {
        "tone": "informative",
        "perspective": "neutral",
        "audience": "general",
        "credibility_indicators": [
            "expert_quotes",
            "data_cited"
        ]
    },
    "ai_source_vector": null,
    "ai_confidence_score": 0.9999999999999999,
    "ai_extraction_metadata": {
        "extracted_at": "2026-09-18T03:03:02.833217Z",
        "ai_model": "gemini-2.5-flash",
        "extraction_method": "automated",
        "content_length": 4881,
        "metadata_prompt_body_chars": 4881,
        "metadata_prompt_truncated": false,
        "url": "https:\/\/nytimes.com\/2026\/09\/16\/us\/politics\/leon-black-contempt-congress.html",
        "existing_metadata": {
            "author_name": null,
            "published_at": null,
            "domain_name": "nytimes.com",
            "site_name": null,
            "section": null,
            "publisher": null
        },
        "openai_refusal_gemini_fallback": false
    }
}

{
    "extracted_at": "2026-09-18T03:03:02.833217Z",
    "ai_model": "gemini-2.5-flash",
    "extraction_method": "automated",
    "content_length": 4881,
    "metadata_prompt_body_chars": 4881,
    "metadata_prompt_truncated": false,
    "url": "https:\/\/nytimes.com\/2026\/09\/16\/us\/politics\/leon-black-contempt-congress.html",
    "existing_metadata": {
        "author_name": null,
        "published_at": null,
        "domain_name": "nytimes.com",
        "site_name": null,
        "section": null,
        "publisher": null
    },
    "openai_refusal_gemini_fallback": false
}