Source Details

{
    "source_type": "extension",
    "content_hash": "ad3722ec2d65b14274777f4bf33e1838394ae007ee17d2a540b4d90d827e03b1",
    "submitted_via": "chrome_extension",
    "extension_version": "1.0.18",
    "original_url": "https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/10\/01\/business\/new-york-times-journalism-reporting-objects.html?emc=edit_nn_20261002&nl=the-morning&segment_id=227407",
    "parsed_content": "175 Years of The TimesOn Our AnniversaryDefining ObjectsVideo: \u2018Madam President\u20198 Fashion TrendsQuiz: Know the Times?Skip to contentSkip to site indexSearch & Section NavigationSection NavigationAccountAccountGoHome U.S.SECTIONSU.S.PoliticsNew YorkCaliforniaEducationHealthObituariesScienceClimateWeatherSportsBusinessTechThe UpshotThe MagazineTOP STORIESDonald TrumpSupreme CourtCongressImmigrationAbortionLatest PollsNEWSLETTERSThe MorningMake sense of the day\u2019s news and ideas.The EveningCatch up on big news, and wind down to end your day.See all newslettersPODCASTSThe DailyThe biggest stories of our time, in 20 minutes a day.See all podcastsWorldSECTIONSWorldAfricaAmericasAsiaAustraliaCanadaEuropeMiddle EastScienceClimateWeatherHealthObituariesTOP STORIESMiddle East CrisisRussia-Ukraine WarChina International RelationsThe Global ProfileLeer en Espa\u00f1olNEWSLETTERSThe WorldA guide to understanding the news, made for readers around the globe.Your Places: Global UpdateThe latest news for any part of the world you select.Canada LetterBackstories and analysis from our Canadian correspondents.See all newslettersBusinessSECTIONSBusinessTechEconomyMediaFinance and MarketsDealBookPersonal TechEnergy TransitionYour MoneyTOP STORIESU.S. EconomyStock MarketArtificial IntelligenceNEWSLETTERSDealBookThe most crucial business and policy news you need to know.On TechOur best tech reporting from the week.See all newslettersPODCASTSHard ForkOur tech journalists help you make sense of the rapidly changing tech world.See all podcastsArtsSECTIONSToday's ArtsBook ReviewBest SellersDanceMoviesMusicTelevisionTheaterPop CultureT MagazineVisual ArtsRECOMMENDATIONS100 Best Movies of the 21st CenturyCritic\u2019s PicksWhat to ReadWhat to WatchWhat to Listen To5 Minutes to Make You Love MusicNEWSLETTERSBooksReviews, news and features to help you find your next read.WatchingStreaming TV and movie recommendations.See all newslettersPODCASTSBook ReviewThe podcast that takes you inside the literary world.PopcastPop music news, new songs and albums, and artists of note.See all podcastsLifestyleSECTIONSAll LifestyleWellTravelStyleReal EstateFoodLoveYour MoneyPersonal TechT MagazineCOLUMNS36 HoursAsk WellThe HuntModern LoveWhere to EatVowsSocial Q\u2019sThe EthicistAsk the TherapistNEWSLETTERSThe WeekenderUnwind with stories about culture and the way we live.WellEssential news and guidance to live your healthiest life.See all newslettersPODCASTSModern LoveThe complicated love lives of real people.See all podcastsOpinionSECTIONSOpinionGuest EssaysEditorialsOp-DocsVideosLettersTOPICSPoliticsWorldBusinessTechClimateHealthCultureCOLUMNISTSJamelle BouieMaureen DowdDavid FrenchThomas L. FriedmanM. GessenMichelle GoldbergEzra KleinNicholas KristofCarlos LozadaTressie McMillan CottomLydia PolgreenBret StephensPODCASTSInteresting TimesMapping the new world order through interviews and conversations.The OpinionsYou've heard the news, here's what to make of it.The Ezra Klein ShowDiscussions of ideas that matter, plus book recommendations.See all podcastsVideoPlaylistsToday's VideosU.S.PoliticsImmigrationNY RegionScienceBusinessCultureBooksWellnessWorldAfricaAmericasAsiaSouth AsiaDonald TrumpMiddle East CrisisRussia-Ukraine CrisisVisual InvestigationsOpinion VideoSee all videosShowsExploreThe HeadlinesThe DailyHard ForkThe Ezra Klein ShowThe OpinionsSerial ProductionsThe Book Review PodcastModern LovePopcastCannonballThe InterviewThe Wirecutter ShowPablo Torre Finds OutSee all showsFeaturedThe Interview Conversations with the world\u2019s most fascinating people.The HeadlinesYour morning listen. Top stories, in 10 minutes.The Last 12 WeeksA five-part series \u2026 on a deadline.NewslettersShowsYour guide to the best New York Times shows this week.SerialBe the first to know about our new shows.See all newslettersGamesWord games, logic puzzles and crosswords, including an extensive archive. Go to GamesPlayCrossplay NEWWordle Spelling Bee The Crossword The Midi Crossword NEWThe Mini Crossword Connections Strands Pips Sudoku Tiles Letter Boxed CommunitySpelling Bee ForumWordplay ColumnWordle ReviewSubmit a CrosswordMeet Our Crossword ConstructorsMini to MaestroWordlebotTake the Puzzle Personality QuizNewslettersGameplayPuzzles, brain teasers, solving tips and more.Easy ModeGet an easy version of one of the hardest crossword puzzles of the week.See all newslettersCookingRecipes, advice and inspiration for everyday cooking, special occasions and more. Go to CookingRecipesEasyDinnerQuickHealthyBreakfastVegetarianVeganChickenPastaDessertEditors' PicksEasy Salmon RecipesSoup and Stew RecipesEasy WeeknightNewest RecipesCheap and Easy Dinner IdeasSlow Cooker RecipesHealthy Breakfast IdeasNewslettersThe Cooking NewsletterNew recipes, easy dinner ideas and smart kitchen tips from Melissa Clark, Sam Sifton and our New York Times Cooking editors.The VeggieDelicious vegetarian recipes and tips from Tanya Sichynsky.Five Weeknight DishesDinner ideas for busy people from Emily Weinstein.See all newslettersWirecutterReviews and recommendations for thousands of products. Go to WirecutterReviewsKitchenTechSleepAppliancesHome and GardenMovingTravelGiftsDealsBaby and KidHealth and FitnessThe Best...Air PurifierElectric ToothbrushPressure WasherCordless Stick VacuumOffice ChairRobot VacuumNewslettersThe RecommendationThe best independent reviews, expert advice and intensively researched deals.Clean EverythingStep-by-step advice on how to keep everything in your home squeaky clean.See all newslettersThe AthleticPersonalized coverage of your sports teams and leagues. Go to The AthleticLEAGUESN.F.L.N.B.A.N.H.L.Premier LeagueM.L.B.College FootballN.C.A.A. Men\u2019sN.C.A.A. Women\u2019sTennisF1Fantasy & BettingW.N.B.A.TOP STORIESToday's HeadlinesN.F.L. Win ProjectionsNEWSLETTERSThe PulseDelivering the top stories in sports, Sunday to Friday.See all newslettersPLAYConnections: Sports Edition Connections: Soccer Edition Connections Coach U.S.InternationalCanadaEspa\u00f1ol\u4e2d\u6587The Objects Our Journalists Can\u2019t ForgetTimes reporters and editors discuss items that have shaped our coverage, including Dean Baquet on the \u201cMadam President\u201d front page that never was.Credit...Supported bySKIP ADVERTISEMENTListen \u00b7 33:44 min Share full articlePhotographs by Henry LeutwylerOct. 1, 2026Leer en espa\u00f1olThis story is part of a series marking 175 years of eyewitness journalism from The New York Times. Read more here.1. The election headline that was never publishedBy Dean BaquetImageIt is widely accepted that the print front page does not have the power it once did \u2014 except for historic events like the election of a new president. It is a keepsake, a memento. So there is enormous pressure to come up with the perfect headline, one that will stand up to time.\u201cMadam President\u201d was just that. It didn\u2019t have the candidate\u2019s name. It did not have to. Those two words caught the fact that America had chosen its first female leader. It was the formal title that would be used in official settings. And the accompanying stories were designed to dwell on the moment, on the changing role of women in society, politics and power. There was even a full discussion over what to call her husband, a former president.Except none of it was ever published, because to the surprise of most of us in the newsroom, and even to the ultimate winner, Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to Donald J. Trump.That night in the newsroom \u2014 the tossing of stories and the frantic creation of new ones \u2014 was a first sign of the confusion and the chaos that would come to characterize American elections for the next decade. Chaos is the right word. The place was filled with guests, friends and spouses who assumed they would witness the election of the first woman as president.AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTI remember feeling conflicted, the editor\u2019s curiosity mixed with the shock that newsrooms nationwide had missed something large. But the overall impulse was to fix the thing, to tear up the paper and start all over again \u2014 which is what we set about doing.We almost always prepare two front pages \u2014 in fact two full packages of stories \u2014 for presidential elections. It would be hard if not impossible to ready the mix of analysis and biography right up against the deadline. American elections are usually pretty close. Mostly there are no surprises, and the perfunctory stories about the losing candidate are set aside. There was in fact a special section ready to go after George W. Bush defeated Al Gore, but the presses were stopped, and the papers were scrapped when Gore withdrew his concession.But in the case of Clinton versus Trump, very little effort was put into the possibility that Trump would win. Most of us believed that it was highly unlikely; almost all polls and conventional political wisdom had Trump losing to Clinton.ImageDean Baquet, center, on election night, 2016.Credit...Hiroko Masuike\/The New York TimesNo \u201cTrump Wins\u201d headline was prepared in advance. It was a lesson, one that would influence reporting in America for the next 10 years. Polls are fine, but nothing beats getting out and talking to people. There had been an enormous shift in the country, and most of the press and political pundits had missed it.But that night started in typical fashion. Newsrooms are largely quiet as the votes come on election night. The stories are mostly written. Fast food is served to the editors and the writers waiting for results. Typical fare is pizza.Trip Gabriel, a reporter assigned to cover voters, recalled being less certain of a Clinton victory. He had seen signs in his travels, but he, too, expected Trump to lose. Trip\u2019s election night assignment was to talk to the mourning Trump voters, at a working-class bar in Ambridge, Pa., a struggling steel town.The bar patrons in Ambridge were not paying much attention to the television coverage droning on. There was a ferocious dart game underway. And they certainly were not mourning, since they were convinced Trump would win.\u201cEverywhere you went there were nothing but Trump signs,\u201d Trip recalled of that part of the state.Back in the New York newsroom, we had to scramble. Reporters and senior leaders huddled around the Politics desk, staring into their phones or at computers as surprising vote tallies started to come in from Florida and elsewhere. Suddenly a race that was to end early was getting close. I called reporters to ask what they were hearing, including one who was in touch with the people around Senator Mitch McConnell. The Republicans remained certain that Trump would lose.But then the numbers came in.In Pennsylvania, Trip got a frantic call from an editor. \u201cOh my God,\u201d the editor said. \u201cHe is going to win.\u201dTrip sat in his rental car in the parking lot of the bar and, in about 45 minutes, tapped out a story that would eventually make the front page under the headline \u201cA Blue-Collar Town in Decline and in Despair Turns to Trump.\u201dThe \u201cMadam President\u201d headline was scrapped for \u201cTrump Triumphs.\u201dDean Baquet was the executive editor of The New York Times from 2014 to 2022. He now leads The Times\u2019s Local Investigations Fellowship.2. The things I carriedBy James P. SterbaImageImageAfter nearly two years of war reporting, I was two days away from leaving Vietnam and cleaning out my room in the Continental Palace Hotel, half a block from The Times\u2019s local office. I packed one bag for my next assignment, in Jakarta, Indonesia, but shipped a few other items home, including keepsakes from the war.A light nylon and polyester poncho liner, tossed to me by a commander at an artillery base one chilly night in the highlands, is still in use; I take it with me to the couch when my snoring wakes my spouse. Several P-38 can openers, essential for eating field rations, are scattered in various drawers. A box of C rations now sits on my home office bookshelf. And I have a helmet, or \u201csteel pot\u201d as it was known, resting on a basement shelf. It came from a combat base near the Demilitarized Zone where incoming North Vietnamese rockets regularly killed and wounded Marines. Someone suggested I grab one from a pile of gear stripped from the dead. Written inside a fold in the canvas camouflage cover of the helmet I picked are two words I took as a dead grunt\u2019s message to me: The first was an expletive. The second was \u201cyou.\u201dJames P. Sterba was a reporter for The Times from 1967 to 1982.3. A flak jacket that fitBy Somini SenguptaImageImageIn August 2003, I was covering the last days of the war to oust Charles Taylor, Liberia\u2019s warlord turned president. A photographer took a picture of me during a firefight, crossing a bridge in Monrovia that divided the rebel-held and government-held sides of the city. The flak jacket I was wearing was clearly too big. I was swimming in it. A bullet or a piece of shrapnel could easily have slipped in.The standard-issue flak jackets available at the time were made for bigger people \u2014 men, presumably. So I asked the International desk to have one made in my size. I chose a color that suits me, forest green, with a matching helmet. It protected me for 15 years and in 10 conflict zones.Somini Sengupta was the West Africa bureau chief for The Times from 2003 to 2005. She is now a correspondent for the International desk.4. Publishing the Unabomber\u2019s manifestoBy Jonathan MahlerImageA copy of Ted Kaczynski\u2019s letter to The New York Times, handwritten by him. Credit...Rosem Morton for The New York TimesThe 35,000-word manuscript \u2014 a dense, philosophical indictment of technology\u2019s effects on humanity and the natural world \u2014 arrived at the offices of The New York Times on June 28, 1995. The accompanying four-page, handwritten cover letter began: \u201cIf the enclosed manuscript is published reasonably soon and receives wide public exposure, we will permanently desist from terrorism.\u201dThe F.B.I. suspected that the author was the Unabomber. The bureau had given the man \u2014 later discovered to be Ted Kaczynski \u2014 the moniker because the earliest recipients of his anonymous mail bombs, which dated back to 1978, were affiliated with universities. His most recent victims, though, had been an advertising executive in 1994, and the president of the California Forestry Association in 1995. He gave The Times three months to print his manuscript \u2014 in full.Newspapers are the product of countless daily decisions, usually driven foremost by news judgment. This was one big decision involving a set of considerations that went far beyond the normal responsibilities of a news organization, and it set off a three-month debate inside the paper over what to do.If The Times published the Unabomber\u2019s treatise, would it create a dangerous precedent, encouraging other terrorists to undertake similar threats? But what if the paper didn\u2019t, and the Unabomber struck again? The consensus inside the broader world of journalism was that it would be a mistake for The Times to concede to any demand from a terrorist.The Washington Post also received a copy of the manuscript with the same demand. The publishers of both papers \u2014 Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. and Donald E. Graham \u2014 agreed that they should act together.With the September deadline looming, Sulzberger, Graham and their executive editors met with the director of the F.B.I., Louis Freeh, and the attorney general, Janet Reno. Typically, when The Times seeks input from the federal government about whether to print something, the response is: Don\u2019t. In this case, Freeh and Reno urged The Times and The Post to publish, hoping that someone would recognize the writing and lead authorities to an arrest.The two papers decided to copublish and agreed to share the printing costs \u2014 though the manuscript would appear in full only as a stand-alone section in The Post, on Sept. 19, 1995. The Post\u2019s circulation was smaller; not only would the printing costs be lower, but it would give the F.B.I. fewer newsstands around the country to monitor for suspicious buyers.A terrorist had successfully pressured the two publications into printing a manifesto with no discernible news value. But weeks later, the Unabomber\u2019s brother, David Kaczynski, read excerpts from the manuscript on the nascent internet, and heard echoes of phrases that his brother had used in letters to him. David\u2019s wife urged him to contact the F.B.I. The longest, most expensive manhunt in the agency\u2019s history soon came to an end. The Unabomber was arrested.Jonathan Mahler is a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine.AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT5. The ad that changed journalismBy David McCrawImageOn a Tuesday morning in March 1960, a legal revolution began in a most unlikely place: a full-page ad in The New York Times.Supporters of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. purchased the ad, headlined \u201cHeed Their Rising Voices,\u201d a phrase picked up from a Times editorial that ran a few days earlier. It called on readers to stand up for civil rights protesters under attack in cities across the South. The ad claimed that, with tear gas and shotguns, the police in Montgomery, Ala., had confronted Black students who were peacefully demonstrating and singing patriotic songs and then padlocked their college dining hall \u201cto starve them into submission.\u201dBut the ad contained minor factual errors, and L.B. Sullivan, a white city commissioner in Montgomery and an ardent supporter of segregation, took notice. He was in charge of the local police, and he sued The Times for libel, even though his name appeared nowhere in the ad. A jury awarded him $500,000.By the time the case reached the Supreme Court in 1964, such suits had become commonplace for Southern officials who hoped that the tactic could drive away the Northern news organizations chronicling civil rights abuses. The Times alone was facing 11 libel suits by local and state officials seeking a total of $5.6 million.ImageDavid McCrawThe Supreme Court was unambiguous in its response. In a unanimous decision, it held that under the First Amendment public officials could no longer prevail in libel suits unless they could prove that the publishers had acted with \u201cactual malice.\u201d Sullivan, who could not show any of the errors were intentional, went home empty-handed.The ad has always struck me as an unlikely vehicle for advancing the cause of press freedom. It wasn\u2019t journalism; it involved no reporting. The decision to publish was made by advertising executives, not editors. And rejecting Sullivan\u2019s libel claim hardly required a deep reappraisal of constitutional law. Did any of Sullivan\u2019s like-minded friends and neighbors really think less of him as a result of a civil rights advocacy ad that never mentioned his name? And ran in a paper that in Montgomery had a circulation of 35?David McCraw is a senior vice president and deputy general counsel for The Times.6. Call me Mr. JacobsBy Pete WellsImageNear the end of 2011, I made up five names to be printed on credit cards that I would use to pay for my meals as The New York Times\u2019s restaurant critic: Glen Bradley, Lee Jacobs, Jeff Michaels, David Malone and Mark Stern traveled along with me all 12 years I worked in the job.Though Times restaurant critics had long made reservations under assumed names to avoid special treatment, the need for fake names on cards became apparent during an early meal when I paid with one of my own. The server took it away and came back with a barely suppressed grin. The next time I arrived at that restaurant, the host didn\u2019t even ask what name the reservation was under. She just smiled and led me to a table.With no offense intended to the real Bradleys and Sterns of the world, the names were meant to be generic. I tried to be inconspicuous, avoiding anything that would stick in a waiter\u2019s memory or cause a double take. As far as I know, the cards never gave me away. If I hadn\u2019t been recognized by the time the check came, I was home free.This system of mismatched names failed me only when I ate alone and had reserved under one of my hundreds of other aliases. Once I\u2019d paid, a server who had been calling me \u201cMr. Thompson\u201d all night would bring me the receipt and say, \u201cThank you and have a nice evening, Mr. Jacobs.\u201dPete Wells is a reporter covering food for The Times. He was the paper\u2019s restaurant critic from 2012 to 2024.7. Dressing for a plagueBy Sheri FinkImageIn 2014, I went to West Africa to write about the widespread Ebola outbreak in three affected countries.I had bought protective gear on Amazon for reporting at a treatment unit and learned how to use it at the Center for Domestic Preparedness in Anniston, Ala., from U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention staff members. We practiced in the September heat, memorizing complicated instructions for removing the gear while avoiding self-contamination.AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe suits had been designed primarily for other settings, including chemical manufacturing plants and pharmaceutical factories. After we arrived in Liberia, we discovered just how challenging the suits were to use in outdoor units: They stopped the virus, which spreads by contact, but they were unbearable to wear for long periods in the high heat and humidity. Medical staff members needed to ration their time with patients to avoid becoming dehydrated and passing out on floors contaminated with infectious body fluids.After coming out of the hot zone, one doctor would sit and pour out what seemed like a liter of sweat from his rubber boots. The sense was that better equipment needed to be produced specifically for infectious-disease workers. It was sad six years later, when Covid emerged, to see that little progress had been made.Sheri Fink is a reporter on the investigations team at The Times whose work often focuses on medical care during crises.Image8. What remained after the crossfireBy Suzanne DaleyIn 1998, sheep farming was a major industry in Lesotho, a tiny, impoverished mountain kingdom surrounded by South Africa. It was not a place you expected to encounter danger. In fact, three years into a four-year stint as the South Africa bureau chief, I had yet to find a reason to go there. So, when citizens began protesting an election, I thought: Here is my chance.But the day I set off from Johannesburg with Jo\u00e3o Silva, our photographer, and Greg Marinovich, a freelancer, South Africa staged a surprise invasion, aiming to end the unrest. The move set Lesotho\u2019s military, numbering about 2,000 soldiers, against one of the continent\u2019s most sophisticated armies. Tanks rolled in. Helicopters circled.The South Africans didn\u2019t expect much of a fight. But they got one. And we drove right into it.Lesotho\u2019s capital, Maseru, was on fire and looters were everywhere. Some 30 people died that day.ImageSuzanne Daley taking shelter in a tank just after her car was shot up in Lesotho.Credit...Jo\u00e3o Silva\/The New York TimesOur effort to reach Lesotho\u2019s Army base outside town became a disaster. When we arrived, snipers shot at us. We crawled from the car into a ditch and waited. After a while, a South African patrol appeared, and we retreated with them, parking at some distance from the base to decide what to do next.It was a poor choice. The engine was barely off before bullets ripped up the right side of the car, wounding Greg in the leg, flattening the tires and knocking out the brakes on that side. Still, we managed to race away, the car listing badly.I am not much for keepsakes. But I kept a piece of that car \u2014 a reminder of how, without warning, life can go very wrong.Suzanne Daley was the South Africa bureau chief for The Times from 1995 to 1999. She now oversees the international print edition.9. Safety in colorsBy Hiroko TabuchiImageImageWhen a tsunami in 2011 crippled the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan, setting off fuel meltdowns, reporters in the field were initially in the dark. How much radiation was out there? Were we safe? Somehow, our Tokyo bureau manager procured a Russian-made Soeks Geiger counter from an obscure corner of Japan\u2019s online marketplace. Smaller than a cellphone, it flashed radiation levels in microsieverts, the preferred international measure, along with simple color codes: green for safe, yellow for caution, red for danger.I took it everywhere, including deep into the radioactive exclusion zone, where clocks remained stopped at 2:46 p.m. and abandoned cows peered through hedges.AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTAt one point, behind a deserted home, the device flashed red, hitting 14 microsieverts an hour. (Background radiation levels are around 0.1 microsieverts an hour.) Yet it was hard to stay terrified of an invisible threat. Not long after the flashes subsided, an evacuee I was with peeled his hazmat suit to his waist to smoke a cigarette.I still wonder if the elevated levels of radiation I encountered increased my risks of getting cancer. When the Soeks spiked, I did try to get the hell out of there. If I live a long, healthy life, I\u2019ll owe it, at least in part, to this little device.Hiroko Tabuchi was the Tokyo business correspondent for The Times from 2009 to 2014. She now covers pollution and the environment.10. After investigating Weinstein for six months, they received this emailBy Jodi Kantor and Megan TwoheyImageOn the morning of Oct. 5, 2017, hours before we published our investigation revealing that the film producer Harvey Weinstein had harassed and abused women for decades, we received an unexpected email.We were waiting for Weinstein\u2019s response to our findings, and to see if he would follow through on threats to sue the paper. And while our article drew on a legal and financial trail of secret settlements and damning human resources records, only two women had been willing to share their accounts on the record.One of them was Laura Madden, who had a terrible account of being abused by Weinstein when she worked as his assistant a quarter-century earlier. For months, she and Jodi had been speaking \u2014 over text, on the phone, on a Cornwall beach \u2014 and she had given us permission to use her name and experience.ImageJodi Kantor and Megan Twohey and colleagues about to publish the Weinstein investigation.Credit...Susanne Craig\/The New York TimesBut making allegations against powerful men could backfire, with accusers suffering public attack. Weinstein was known to be vengeful. Madden, and every other woman involved, faced the question: Why take the leap?She was also contending with another factor. Madden had recently been treated for breast cancer, and her second mastectomy and reconstructive surgery were going to collide with the publication of our article.As our deadline approached, we worried that she would drop out.At 6:56 a.m., we received an email from Madden:I feel obliged to talk about the events that happened to me at Miramax as I realise that I\u2019m in the fortunate position of not being employed in the film business and so my livelihood won\u2019t be affected. I\u2019m also not one of those that have been silenced even though individuals under Harvey Weinstein have tried to persuade me to be silent. I do not have a gagging order against me either. I feel I am speaking out on behalf of women who can\u2019t because their livelihoods or marriages may be affected. I am the mother of 3 daughters and I do not want them to have to accept this kind of bullying behaviour in any setting as \u2018normal\u2019. I have been through life changing health issues and know that time is precious and confronting bullies is important. My family are all supportive of my decision.I am happy to go on record.Good luckBest wishesLauraJodi Kantor and Megan Twohey are investigative reporters at The Times. Their investigation of Harvey Weinstein shared in the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for public service.11. Tea set and sympathyBy David RohdeImageLike dozens of reporters on Sept. 11, 2001, I headed to the World Trade Center after news reports that a plane had crashed into one of the towers. When I got off the subway, I saw both towers ablaze. Like thousands of others, I ran for my life as each collapsed.Soon after, though, I headed toward 125 Cedar Street, fearing that my college friend\u2019s mother might be trapped inside. It was the apartment where, years before, I\u2019d spent my first night in New York. It also looked out on the World Trade Center.I found a firefighter and asked him to help me search the apartment. After he broke down the door with an ax, we found no one inside. The towers\u2019 collapses had blown the windows inward \u2014 not simply shattering the glass but blasting the metal frames into the apartment and hurling them to the floor.Bits of concrete and glass blanketed the apartment, which was caked in dust. On the floor, I found a tattered sheet of paper from Cantor Fitzgerald, an investment firm in the north tower that lost 658 people that day. How the paper landed in the apartment baffled me; the home faced the south tower, not the north one.A few days later, I visited the apartment again with Eddie Keating, a Times photographer. When we walked inside, I thought the windows, or perhaps the paper from Cantor Fitzgerald on the floor, might catch Eddie\u2019s eye.Instead, Eddie, saying little, crisscrossed the unit. The click of his camera intermittently broke the silence. We left, I think, after about 10 minutes, eager to capture what we could at ground zero before the police kicked us out.ImageDavid RohdeDays later, a picture Eddie took in the apartment ran on the front of a section called \u201cA Nation Challenged.\u201d It was a close-up of a pewter tea set caked in dust, a 30-year-old wedding gift. It was an ordinary object that I had completely missed. Eddie said he walked past the tea set several times without taking a picture of it. He did so just before leaving the apartment because he felt the tea set screamed out to him to be photographed. Eddie, of course, saw something: the line between before and after.For months, Eddie devoted himself to chronicling the search for survivors and the cleanup at ground zero \u2014 breathing noxious air, evading police, even disguising himself as a worker. He used photography to capture what was lost and the heroism of the searchers. His work helped The Times win the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for breaking news photography. But the tea set will forever be his defining image of those days.The tea set, now cleaned, sits in the 9\/11 Memorial Museum. After my friend\u2019s mother, Elaine Williamson, passed away in 2013, her family donated it to the museum. Eddie died of cancer in 2021 at the age of 65. He attributed the disease to the months he spent at ground zero. Before his death, he called me with a simple request: Would I sign an affidavit attesting to the fact that he had worked at ground zero? I did.David Rohde was a reporter at The Times from 1996 to 2011. He is now a senior national security reporter for MS NOW.12. Distraction during wartimeBy Sarah LyallImageBefore there was Wordle, before there was Connections, before there was Spelling Bee or Strands or Sudoku, there was the O.G. of New York Times puzzles: the Crossword. And before the Crossword, the paper had no puzzles at all.The publication of the first crossword, on Feb. 15, 1942, was a concession to popular taste and a bold leap into new territory for the staid Times. While most major American newspapers had carried crosswords for years, the paper refused to publish them and regularly inveighed against them in print. They are \u201ca primitive sort of mental exercise,\u201d The Times wrote, irritably, in 1924, and \u201ca sinful waste of time.\u201dBut then came the bombing of Pearl Harbor, on Dec. 7, 1941, and the mood in the country turned dark. Didn\u2019t the readers deserve a diversionary activity?\u201cWe ought to proceed with the puzzle,\u201d The Times\u2019s Sunday editor, Lester Markel, wrote on Dec. 18 in a memo to the publisher, Arthur Hays Sulzberger, \u201cespecially in view of the fact it is possible there will now be bleak blackout hours \u2014 or if not that then certainly a need for relaxation of some kind or other.\u201dMarkel\u2019s memo was attached to a note to the publisher from the pioneering crossword editor Margaret Petherbridge Farrar, who made her own case for why the paper should have the puzzle. \u201cI don\u2019t think I have to sell you on the increased demand for this type of pastime in an increasingly worried world,\u201d she wrote.ImageSarah LyallShe added, \u201cYou can\u2019t think of your troubles while solving a crossword.\u201dThe modern crossword had been brought into being by Arthur Wynne of The New York World, when he devised what he called a \u201cWord-Cross,\u201d which made its debut on Dec. 21, 1913.In 1921, the editor in chief\u2019s secretary, Margaret Petherbridge \u2014 she would become Margaret Farrar when she married John C. Farrar, a founder of Farrar, Straus and Giroux \u2014 was assigned to help Wynne.Though at first she dismissed crosswords as \u201ca sort of necessary nuisance in the obscurest corner of the paper,\u201d she soon caught the bug herself.Meanwhile, Americans were going wild for the new pastime. A book of crosswords edited by Petherbridge and others published in 1924 by the fledgling Simon & Schuster publishing company sold 350,000 copies the first year alone. Libraries were inundated by cruciverbalists, as crossword-puzzle solvers are called.ImageLester Markel\u2019s letter to Adolph Ochs Sulzberger, arguing for the inclusion of crosswords in The Times.Credit...Tony Cenicola\/The New York TimesWhen The Times finally changed course, there was really only one person to hire to run this new feature: Farrar. In her 26 years as the paper\u2019s founding Crossword puzzle editor, she helped begin the era of the modern crossword, establishing industrywide standards and practices. Among her rules: All the letters in the puzzle have to intersect with at least one other letter, no words can be repeated in the grid and the grid has to have rotational symmetry. (These are broken on special occasions.)The first puzzle, written by Charles Erlenkotter, was titled \u201cHeadlines and Footnotes.\u201d There were questions about trivia, vocabulary and current events; quotations from Shakespeare; references to Greek and Roman mythology; and lots of references to the war.Farrar, christened the \u201cgrand dame of the American crossword puzzle\u201d by The Washington Post, occasionally contributed puzzles she\u2019d written herself, under the pseudonym Anna Gram. She continued editing puzzles after her retirement from The Times. When she died, in 1984, she was working on her 134th book of crossword puzzles.Sarah Lyall is a writer at large for The Times.13. Light in the tunnelBy Archie TseImageImageArchie Tse\u2019s sketchbook from his time in Saddam Hussein\u2019s hiding place.Credit...The New York TimesIn late 2003, I was on assignment in Iraq for the Graphics desk when the U.S. military captured Saddam Hussein, the deposed Iraqi leader. He was found hiding in a \u201cspider hole\u201d at an isolated, rustic farm near Tikrit.The day after his capture was announced, journalists were allowed to visit the site. We assembled at a temporary U.S. base, but military press officers said they had reached the limit on how many journalists they could accommodate. With the help of John Burns, our chief foreign correspondent, I pleaded with the military press officer, explaining that I was the only Graphics reporter there. John and I made it on the last Black Hawk helicopter to the farm.At the site, we took turns going down into the spider hole, a vertical shaft just wide enough for a single person. It opened into a horizontal space that was about six feet long, 2.5 feet wide and 2.5 feet tall. An air vent was at one end and a fluorescent lightbulb was at the other. Neither was turned on, so the space felt dark and claustrophobic.In New York, when I was preparing for the assignment, I had packed a headlamp, mainly out of being compulsively overprepared. But down in the hole, it proved useful, allowing me to quickly draw the coffin-like space in my sketchbook.From those sketches, we published an illustrated diagram of the site, giving readers a detailed look at where Hussein had spent his last moments as a fugitive.Archie Tse is the graphics director at The Times.14. A special deliveryBy Susanne CraigImageImageRunning for his first term as president, Donald Trump repeatedly promised voters he would release his tax returns. He never did, and I spent months trying to pull back the curtain on his finances. Then, on a Friday in September 2016, I found in my office mailbox a lone Manila envelope containing three pages of what appeared to be Trump\u2019s 1995 tax returns. They revealed staggering losses for that year \u2014 almost $1 billion, a figure at odds with the image of the successful businessman he was presenting to voters.After authenticating the documents, my colleagues and I began a yearslong reporting odyssey. It led to revelations that Trump had inherited hundreds of millions of dollars from his father, much of it enhanced through tax fraud, and that most of his businesses consistently lost money.Susanne Craig is an investigative reporter for The Times. She shared the 2019 Pulitzer Prize for explanatory reporting with David Barstow and Russ Buettner.AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT",
    "published_at": "2026-10-01T09:00:45+00:00",
    "author_name": "https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/by\/henry-leutwyler",
    "site_name": "The New York Times",
    "section": "Business",
    "publisher": "The New York Times Company",
    "ai_headline": "175 Years of The TimesOn Our AnniversaryDefining ObjectsVideo: \u2018Madam President\u20198 Fashion TrendsQuiz: Know the Times?",
    "ai_simplified_title": "New York Times Celebrates 175th Anniversary with Defining Objects and Trends",
    "ai_excerpt": "Years of The TimesOn Our AnniversaryDefining ObjectsVideo Madam President Fashion TrendsQuiz Know the Times Skip to contentSkip to site indexSearch Section NavigationSection NavigationAccountAccoun...",
    "ai_subject_tags": [
        "New York Times",
        "Anniversary",
        "Journalism",
        "History",
        "Culture",
        "Reporting",
        "Media History",
        "US Elections",
        "2016 Election",
        "Vietnam War"
    ],
    "ai_context_type": "Other",
    "ai_context_details": {
        "tone": "celebratory",
        "perspective": "institutional",
        "audience": "general",
        "credibility_indicators": {
            "0": "expert_quotes",
            "1": "first_person_accounts",
            "3": "historical_accounts",
            "6": "named_authors",
            "7": "Pulitzer_Prize_cited",
            "9": "historical_references"
        }
    },
    "ai_source_vector": null,
    "ai_confidence_score": 0.9999999999999999,
    "ai_extraction_metadata": {
        "extracted_at": "2026-10-02T13:01:12.819602Z",
        "ai_model": "gemini-2.5-flash",
        "extraction_method": "automated",
        "content_length": 6024,
        "metadata_prompt_body_chars": 6024,
        "metadata_prompt_truncated": false,
        "url": "https:\/\/nytimes.com\/2026\/10\/01\/business\/new-york-times-journalism-reporting-objects.html",
        "existing_metadata": {
            "author_name": null,
            "published_at": null,
            "domain_name": "nytimes.com",
            "site_name": null,
            "section": null,
            "publisher": null
        },
        "openai_refusal_gemini_fallback": false,
        "chunking_used": true,
        "total_chunks": 7,
        "chunk_merge_method": "comprehensive",
        "merged_at": "2026-10-02T13:01:27.652308Z"
    }
}

{
    "extracted_at": "2026-10-02T13:01:12.819602Z",
    "ai_model": "gemini-2.5-flash",
    "extraction_method": "automated",
    "content_length": 6024,
    "metadata_prompt_body_chars": 6024,
    "metadata_prompt_truncated": false,
    "url": "https:\/\/nytimes.com\/2026\/10\/01\/business\/new-york-times-journalism-reporting-objects.html",
    "existing_metadata": {
        "author_name": null,
        "published_at": null,
        "domain_name": "nytimes.com",
        "site_name": null,
        "section": null,
        "publisher": null
    },
    "openai_refusal_gemini_fallback": false,
    "chunking_used": true,
    "total_chunks": 7,
    "chunk_merge_method": "comprehensive",
    "merged_at": "2026-10-02T13:01:27.652308Z"
}