Claim Details

View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.

Back to Claims

Claim Information

Complete details about this extracted claim.

Claim Text
Robert Crowe, a partner of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough and the co-chair of the firm’s government relations practice, implies that there is difference between being a lawyer and being a lobbyist.
Simplified Text
Robert Crowe implies a difference between being a lawyer and being a lobbyist
Confidence Score
0.900
Claim Maker
The author
Context Type
Magazine Article
Context Details
{
    "topic": "Difference between lawyers and lobbyists",
    "person": "Robert Crowe",
    "position": "Partner and co-chair",
    "organization": "Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough"
}
Subject Tags
UUID
9fdb347c-6f62-43b0-a165-6b8989bfa6a6
Vector Index
✗ No vector
Created
September 12, 2025 at 12:51 AM (1 day ago)
Last Updated
September 12, 2025 at 12:51 AM (1 day ago)

Original Sources for this Claim (1)

All source submissions that originally contained this claim.

Screenshot of https://clp.law.harvard.edu/knowledge-hub/magazine/issues/lawyers-in-politics/politics-outside-of-office/
https://clp.law.harvard.edu/knowledge-hub/magazine/issues/lawyers-in-politics/politics-outside-of-office/

full issue Newly released data provides strong evidence that lawyers are no longer as dominant as they once were in many sectors of elected U S political office Similarly there

Lawyers
Politics
Lobbying
US Politics
Government
Legal Profession
Government Relations
Washington DC
Political Influence
Career Paths

Similar Claims (0)

Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.

No similar claims found

This claim appears to be unique in the system.

Claim Management System - MVP