Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
One amendment would let porn performers retroactively withdraw consent for their material to be published online, leaving people vulnerable to legal action if they don't take down a video anytime anyone who appears in it asks them to.
- Simplified Text
-
Porn performers can retroactively withdraw consent.
- Confidence Score
- 0.900
- UUID
- 0cfd466d-57c5-49e4-bbdb-860940e245a9
- Vector Index
- âś— No vector
- Created
- December 5, 2025 at 11:06 PM (8 months ago)
- Last Updated
- December 5, 2025 at 11:06 PM (8 months ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
28
claims
🔥
1 week ago
https://reason.com/2025/11/12/moral-panic-about-rough-sex-gives-way-to-censorship-in-the-uk
Similar Claims (5)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
-
Simplified: No allowances for contracts; content must be taken down after consent revoked.8 months ago
-
Simplified: Gabby Bertin et al.'s amendment is confusingly written.8 months ago
-
Simplified: Goudie proposes making paying for sex illegal.8 months ago
-
Simplified: Bertin, Kidron, Kennedy, and Benjamin proposed making it illegal to create indecent photos of adults posing as minors.8 months ago
-
Simplified: Alison Levitt's amendment would make possessing choking porn illegal.8 months ago