Claims tagged with "Legal"

View all claims tagged with "Legal"

Clear Filter

Subject Tag

Extracted Claims (1496)

Explaining his decision during a hearing, Kelly cited Sherrill v. Knight, a 1977 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that addressed the denial of a hard pass based on an "advers... 1.000

👤 Jacob Sullum 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Historical , Court Cases

Simplified: During a hearing, Judge Timothy J. Kelly cited Sherrill v. Knight, a 1977 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit decision concerning hard pass den...

1 sources

1 week ago
After the White House restored Acosta's press pass, CNN agreed to drop the lawsuit. 1.000

👤 Jacob Sullum 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Media , White House

Simplified: After the White House restored Jim Acosta's press pass, CNN agreed to drop its lawsuit.

2 sources

1 week ago
The appeals court heard oral argument in the case last November but has not issued a decision yet. 1.000

👤 The author 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , White House

Simplified: The D.C. Circuit Court heard oral argument in the case in November 2025 but has not yet issued a decision.

1 sources

1 week ago
The amicus brief concludes that "Broadcasters' decisions about what stories to tell, what their editorial positions will be, and who they should hire to convey those messages are all protected by the... 0.950

👤 Amicus brief 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , First Amendment , Attributed Statement

Simplified: The amicus brief concludes that broadcasters' decisions on stories, editorial positions, and hiring are protected by the First Amendment.

2 sources

1 week ago
According to the FIRE brief, the FCC's case against Disney is extremely weak, with the claim of "unlawful discrimination" stemming from the accusation that Disney took part in diversity, equity, and i... 0.950

👤 FIRE brief 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Regulation , Attributed Statement

Simplified: The FIRE brief states the FCC's case against Disney is weak, alleging "unlawful discrimination" due to Disney's DEI initiatives.

1 sources

1 week ago
The amicus brief states that "Courts have rejected the assumption that DEI initiatives necessarily violate antidiscrimination laws." 0.950

👤 Amicus brief 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Attributed Statement

Simplified: The amicus brief states that courts have rejected the assumption that DEI initiatives necessarily violate antidiscrimination laws.

1 sources

1 week ago
The amicus brief states that FCC Chairman Carr cited Trump's executive orders, neither of which "offered a definition of DEI" but simply "seemed to assume DEI, however defined, is a per se violation o... 0.950

👤 Amicus brief 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Policy , Attributed Statement

Simplified: The amicus brief states that FCC Chairman Carr cited Trump's executive orders, which did not define DEI but assumed it was a per se violation of civil...

1 sources

1 week ago
Mark S. Fowler, who spearheaded a deregulatory effort as FCC chairman under President Ronald Reagan, wrote in August 2026 that "The FCC's proceedings against ABC are a gross denial of procedural and s... 0.950

👤 Mark S. Fowler 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Regulation , Attributed Statement

Simplified: Mark S. Fowler, a former FCC chairman under Ronald Reagan, wrote in August 2026 that the FCC's proceedings against ABC deny due process.

1 sources

1 week ago
The amicus brief was filed on behalf of several free speech advocacy organizations, including the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), the Cato Institute, the Competitive Enterprise... 0.950

👤 The author 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Organizations

Simplified: The amicus brief was filed on behalf of FIRE, Cato Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Reporters Without Borders, and PEN America.

1 sources

1 week ago
An amicus brief filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in September 2026 states that "The FCC's initiation of early renewal for the ABC Television Network's licenses for its own... 0.950

👤 Amicus brief 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Regulation , Media , Attributed Statement

Simplified: An amicus brief filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in September 2026 states that the FCC's early renewal initiation for ABC...

1 sources

1 week ago
Seven days after the lawsuit was filed, a federal district court granted a temporary restraining order stopping Paramount from "closing or consummating" the merger. 1.000

👤 The author 📋 News Article 🏷️ Government , Legal , Corporate

Simplified: Seven days after the antitrust lawsuit was filed in July 2026, a federal district court issued a temporary restraining order preventing Paramount from...

1 sources

1 week ago
For Paramount, the punitive settlement means it avoids a $7 million-a-day "ticking fee" owed to Warner Bros. shareholders—about $650 million a quarter—set to kick in at the start of October. 1.000

👤 The author 📋 News Article 🏷️ Finance , Legal , Corporate

Simplified: The punitive settlement allows Paramount to avoid a $7 million-a-day "ticking fee," approximately $650 million per quarter, owed to Warner Bros. share...

2 sources

1 week ago
Paramount Skydance agreed Monday to settle with California and 11 other states that sued to block its $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 1.000

👤 The author 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Corporate , Mergers and Acquisitions

Simplified: Paramount Skydance agreed on Monday, September 21, 2026, to settle with California and 11 other states regarding its $110 billion acquisition of Warne...

5 sources

1 week ago
The deal reportedly includes a "new board for CBS News and CNN to ensure editorial independence" as well as a $30 million penalty—90 percent of which would go to the company's employees—for each movie... 1.000

👤 CNBC 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Corporate , Media Regulation

Simplified: The Paramount Skydance settlement deal reportedly includes a new board for CBS News and CNN to ensure editorial independence, and a $30 million penalt...

4 sources

1 week ago
The court held that a gunshot alert and an ALPR hit did not adequately connect the minivan to a shooting the day before. 0.950

👤 Del Schlangen 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Evidence , Court Case

Simplified: In State v. Carrillo, the court held that a gunshot alert and an ALPR hit did not adequately connect the minivan to a shooting that occurred the day b...

1 sources

1 week ago
Last March, in State v. Carrillo, a state appeals court ordered suppression of evidence (an unlawfully possessed handgun) discovered in a minivan after a traffic stop. 0.950

👤 Del Schlangen 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Evidence , Court Case

Simplified: In March 2026, a state appeals court in State v. Carrillo ordered the suppression of evidence, an unlawfully possessed handgun, found in a minivan aft...

1 sources

1 week ago
Last May in Commonwealth v. Foster, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld a stop where police responded within seconds to late-night alerts from a gunfire microphone, found only two people, and observ... 0.950

👤 Del Schlangen 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Surveillance , Court Case

Simplified: In May 2026, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld a stop in Commonwealth v. Foster where police responded quickly to gunfire microphone alerts, found...

1 sources

1 week ago
Last March in United States v. Porter, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that using a 10-camera ALPR network to locate a known vehicle was not a search. 0.950

👤 Del Schlangen 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Fourth Amendment , Surveillance , Court Case

Simplified: In March 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held in United States v. Porter that using a 10-camera ALPR network to locate a known veh...

1 sources

1 week ago
In the 2024 case United States v. Daniels, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit noted that no crime was reported. 0.950

👤 Del Schlangen 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Court Case

Simplified: In the 2024 case United States v. Daniels, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit noted that no crime was reported.

1 sources

1 week ago
The Supreme Court's 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen protects lawful public carry. 0.950

👤 Del Schlangen 📋 News Article 🏷️ Legal , Supreme Court , Second Amendment

Simplified: The Supreme Court's 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen protects lawful public carry.

1 sources

1 week ago