Claims tagged with "Legal"

View all claims tagged with "Legal"

Clear Filter

Subject Tag

Extracted Claims (996)

What matters about today’s Court is more than simply how many Justices sit on it, how and why they were appointed, or what role it occupies in our constitutional order. 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: What matters about today’s Court is more than how many Justices sit on it

1 sources

2 months ago
Opposition to the Court’s recent rulings is far from unanimous. 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Opposition to Court’s recent rulings is far from unanimous

1 sources

2 months ago
The anticanonical cases denied citizenship to Black people. 1.000

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Historical

Simplified: Anticanonical cases denied citizenship to Black people

1 sources

2 months ago
Defenders of the Court’s status should be made to answer these objections directly. 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Defenders of Court’s status should answer these objections directly

1 sources

2 months ago
Proponents of reform should be clear that this is why they object. 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Proponents of reform should be clear that this is why they object

1 sources

2 months ago
Getting down to the real, unspoken issue can yield several benefits, even if it does not immediately resolve the conflict. 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Getting down to real issue can yield several benefits

1 sources

2 months ago
The anticanon refers to a select set of cases that were “wrong the day [they were] decided.” 0.950

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Historical

Simplified: Anticanon refers to select set of cases that were wrong the day decided

1 sources

2 months ago
We have a moral duty to support any legal regime that is reasonably just. 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: We have moral duty to support any reasonably just legal regime

1 sources

2 months ago
People can reasonably call on the Court to change if the Court is failing to meet the limits of providing rights of democratic participation, fair application of laws, and a set of institutions and ri... 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: People can call on Court to change if Court fails to meet limits

1 sources

2 months ago
The government must provide rights of democratic participation for the legal regime to be reasonably just. 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Government must provide rights of democratic participation for legal regime to be reasonably just

1 sources

2 months ago
The concept of moral legitimacy can support compliance with the Court’s decisions. 0.950

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal

Simplified: Moral legitimacy can support compliance with Court decisions

1 sources

2 months ago
Another reason for reforming the Court is that the process for selecting Justices causes the Court’s decisions to be influenced by the wrong factors. 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Another reason for reforming Court is process for selecting Justices causes Court's decisions to be influenced by wrong factors

1 sources

2 months ago
Professor Larry Kramer concludes that the power of “judicial review was never imagined.” 0.900

👤 Professor Larry Kramer 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Historical

Simplified: Professor Larry Kramer concludes power of judicial review was never imagined

1 sources

2 months ago
Professor Richard Fallon disagrees: as long as some assumptions are true, “judicial review is reasonably defensible within the terms of liberal political theory.” 0.900

👤 Professor Richard Fallon 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Professor Richard Fallon disagrees as long as some assumptions are true judicial review is reasonably defensible within terms of liberal political the...

1 sources

2 months ago
Professor Jeremy Waldron thinks that “judicial review is inappropriate for reasonably democratic societies . . . . Ordinary legislative procedures [are enough, and] . . . an additional layer of final... 0.900

👤 Professor Jeremy Waldron 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Professor Jeremy Waldron thinks judicial review is inappropriate for reasonably democratic societies ordinary legislative procedures are enough additi...

1 sources

2 months ago
Regarding the selection process, a potential nominee’s partisan affiliation plays an important role in judicial selection in both the Supreme Court and lower federal courts. 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Regarding selection process potential nominee's partisan affiliation plays important role in judicial selection in both Supreme Court and lower federa...

1 sources

2 months ago
The Supreme Court has claimed to be and has been treated as the “ultimate expositor of the Constitution” since the 1950s. 0.950

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Supreme Court has been treated as ultimate expositor of Constitution since 1950s

1 sources

2 months ago
Professor Keith Whittington writes: “It is a bit of an embarrassment that [judicial review,] such a fundamental aspect of American constitutionalism[,] was not explicitly incorporated into the [Consti... 0.900

👤 Professor Keith Whittington 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Historical

Simplified: Professor Keith Whittington writes it is embarrassment that judicial review was not explicitly incorporated into Constitution's text

1 sources

2 months ago
Politicians now treat the Court as a prize to be contested, which they do by engaging in gamesmanship, appointing younger judges to maximize their life tenure, and framing nomination hearings as polit... 0.900

👤 The author 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Political

Simplified: Politicians now treat Court as prize to be contested which they do by engaging in gamesmanship appointing younger judges to maximize their life tenure...

1 sources

2 months ago
Professor Michael Klarman notes that, after Marbury, “[t]he Court[] . . . fail[ed] to invalidate a single state law until 1810 and a second federal law . . . until 1857. Thus, the judicial review powe... 0.900

👤 Professor Michael Klarman 📋 Legal Analysis 🏷️ Legal , Historical

Simplified: Professor Michael Klarman notes after Marbury Court failed to invalidate single state law until 1810 and second federal law until 1857 judicial review...

1 sources

2 months ago