Claims
View and explore all extracted claims from processed sources.
Extracted Claims (28411)
-
👤 The author 📋 Legal AnalysisSimplified: Scholars and politicians advanced proposals to address problems1 sources8 months ago
-
👤 The author 📋 Legal AnalysisSimplified: Some progressives might not be mobilized by reforms that prioritize a Court whose membership simply splits the difference between conservative and lib...1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: President Roosevelt proposed bill that would add six new seats to the Court1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Nation was confronting excesses of Gilded Age and vast disparities in wealth and income that arose from monopolies automation and labor-force transfor...1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Supreme Court has been treated as ultimate expositor of Constitution since 1950s1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Methods used to resolve constitutional question include original intent textual meaning and historical practice1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Professor Michael Klarman notes after Marbury Court failed to invalidate single state law until 1810 and second federal law until 1857 judicial review...1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Political-power arguments take the position that it is accep1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Reformers propose variety of modifications to Court's power of judicial review to address problems1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Debate around jurisdiction-stripping proposals defies brief summary because it encompasses diverse elements1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Professor Richard Fallon disagrees as long as some assumptions are true judicial review is reasonably defensible within terms of liberal political the...1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Regarding selection process potential nominee's partisan affiliation plays important role in judicial selection in both Supreme Court and lower federa...1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Judicial supremacy empowers Court to undermine or invalidate legislative and agency action as inconsistent with Constitution1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Professor Larry Kramer concludes power of judicial review was never imagined1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Professors Saikrishna Prakash and John Yoo disagree concluding there is wealth of evidence Founders believed courts could exercise some form of judici...1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Professor Keith Whittington writes it is embarrassment that judicial review was not explicitly incorporated into Constitution's text1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Professor Jeremy Waldron thinks judicial review is inappropriate for reasonably democratic societies ordinary legislative procedures are enough additi...1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Another reason for reforming Court is process for selecting Justices causes Court's decisions to be influenced by wrong factors1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Politicians now treat Court as prize to be contested which they do by engaging in gamesmanship appointing younger judges to maximize their life tenure...1 sources8 months ago
-
Simplified: Interest in reforming the Court grew in the late 2010s and early 2020s as the public's relationship to the Court changed1 sources8 months ago