Claims
View and explore all extracted claims from processed sources.
Extracted Claims (18452)
-
Simplified: Disempowerment arguments take the position that the Constitution permits or even requires reducing the Court's power to invalidate actions of the othe...1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: This Chapter argues that looking to the substance of the Court's decisions brings a more complete case for Court reform into view1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: Interest in reforming the Court grew in the late 2010s and early 2020s as the public's relationship to the Court changed1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: People have supported the Court more than Congress or the presidency over at least the last fifty years1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: This excitement is out of the ordinary1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: Supreme Court reform is in the air1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: President Trump had appointed three Justices each to the outrage of liberals and progressives1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: The Court started a new era in which it declined to protect abortion and voting rights and invalidated affirmative action environmental protection and...1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: The formal debate is complicated with reasonable perspectives on all sides1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: Justices Scalia and Ginsburg were dead1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: One might think Supreme Court reformers are progressives who lost the judicial game and want to change its rules so that they win because the pro-refo...1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: An important question for reformers is why the Court ought to be changed other than competing political interests because selfish disregard for the ru...1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: Formal arguments are abstract ideas about the Court's structure and role in our democracy1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: Substantive arguments answer the question is the Court doing the right thing1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: Many would dispute that this Court has transgressed that kind of boundary1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: The substantive emergency represents a claim that the Court is crossing a moral line beyond which its decisions can no longer be respected1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: Formal arguments refute the objection that Court reformers are nothing but sore losers1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: The kind of substantive emergency that would require Court reform is different in kind from mere political disagreement1 sources2 months ago
-
Faith in public and private institutions had declined for Americans across the political spectrum. 0.900Simplified: Faith in public and private institutions had declined for Americans across the political spectrum1 sources2 months ago
-
Simplified: Procedural-fairness arguments take the position that the way that Justices are currently selected is too partisan or arbitrary to be consistent with j...1 sources2 months ago