Claim Details

View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.

Back to Claims

Claim Information

Complete details about this extracted claim.

Claim Text
Daniel Cox defines “attention infidelity” as when a partner’s digital life intrudes on an in-person connection.
Simplified Text
Daniel Cox defines "attention infidelity" as a partner's digital life intruding on an in-person connection.
Confidence Score
0.900
Claim Maker
Daniel Cox
Context Type
News Article
Context Details
{
    "referenced_document": "Generation Uncoupled: America\u2019s New Gender Divide and the Crisis of Human Connection"
}
Subject Tags
Definition Social Science
UUID
d602383c-ce42-48a4-bfa6-b4e236fef1ae
Vector Index
✗ No vector
Created
September 30, 2026 at 1:04 PM (1 week ago)
Last Updated
September 30, 2026 at 1:04 PM (1 week ago)

Original Sources for this Claim (1)

All source submissions that originally contained this claim.

Screenshot of https://nytimes.com/2026/09/30/opinion/attention-infidelity-ruin-romance.html
Attention Infidelity Is Ruining Romance
Completed Opinion
16 claims 🔥
1 week ago
https://nytimes.com/2026/09/30/opinion/attention-infidelity-ruin-romance.html

Jessica Grose explores 'attention infidelity' and its impact on modern romance, particularly for Gen Z. She discusses how smartphone use and online interactions are affecting young people's ability to form deep connections and navigate relationships.

Attention Infidelity Smartphones Gen Z Relationships Social Media Dating Technology Impact Culture

Similar Claims (5)

Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.