Claim Details

View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.

Back to Claims

Claim Information

Complete details about this extracted claim.

Claim Text
As Withrow tells Reason, "any regulation should target actual demonstrated harms, not hypothetical use cases that, as far as I can tell, don't exist."
Simplified Text
Josh Withrow told Reason that any regulation should target actual demonstrated harms, not hypothetical use cases that do not exist.
Confidence Score
1.000
Claim Maker
Josh Withrow
Context Type
News Article
Context Details
{
    "date": "2026-09-29",
    "person": "Josh Withrow"
}
UUID
cbb55873-2f5e-4ca0-b66e-803501984fe9
Vector Index
✗ No vector
Created
September 30, 2026 at 5:00 AM (2 weeks ago)
Last Updated
September 30, 2026 at 5:00 AM (2 weeks ago)

Original Sources for this Claim (1)

All source submissions that originally contained this claim.

Screenshot of https://reason.com/2026/09/29/seattles-surveillance-pricing-ban-is-a-solution-searching-for-a-problem
https://reason.com/2026/09/29/seattles-surveillance-pricing-ban-is-a-solution-searching-for-a-problem

Seattle passed an ordinance banning 'surveillance pricing' by grocery retailers, aiming to prevent price manipulation based on personal data. Critics argue the ban targets a theoretical problem and could eliminate beneficial discounts and loyalty programs, potentially making groceries more expensive.

Similar Claims (5)

Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.