Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
in 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in <em><a href="https://campaignlegal.org/cases-actions/citizens-united-v-fec" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Citizens United v. FEC</a></em> and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit’s decision in <em><a href="https://campaignlegal.org/cases-actions/speechnoworg-v-fec" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">SpeechNow v. FEC</a></em>. These decisions <a href="https://campaignlegal.org/update/how-does-citizens-united-decision-still-affect-us-2022" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">essentially enabled</a> corporations and wealthy special interests to flood elections with unlimited amounts of campaign spending. </p>
- Simplified Text
-
2010 Supreme Court Citizens United v FEC decision enabled unlimited campaign spending by corporations and wealthy interests
- Confidence Score
- 0.900
- Claim Maker
- The author
- Context Type
- Blog Post
- Context Details
-
{ "year": 2010, "court": "U.S. Supreme Court", "court_case": "Citizens United v. FEC" } - Subject Tags
- UUID
- 9fdb4368-b7b6-468b-a53d-cd34dc845232
- Vector Index
- ✗ No vector
- Created
- September 12, 2025 at 1:32 AM (5 days ago)
- Last Updated
- September 12, 2025 at 1:32 AM (5 days ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
65
claims
🔥
5 days ago
https://campaignlegal.org/update/pacs-super-pacs-and-more-your-guide-key-election-spending-vehicles
This guide explains different types of political action committees (PACs) and their roles in US elections. It covers Super PACs, dark money groups, and other key players influencing campaign finance.
Similar Claims (0)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
No similar claims found
This claim appears to be unique in the system.