Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
The law firms that received letters from Acting Chair Andrea Lucas include: A&O Shearman; Debevoise & Plimpton LLP; Cooley LLP; Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP; Goodwin Procter LLP; Hogan Lovells LLP; Kirkland & Ellis LLP; Latham & Watkins LLP; McDermott Will & Emery; Milbank LLP; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP; Morrison & Foerster LLP; Perkins Coie; Reed Smith; Ropes & Gray LLP; Sidley Austin LLP; Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP; White & Case LLP; and WilmerHale.[7][61]
- Simplified Text
-
A&O Shearman Debevoise & Plimpton LLP Cooley LLP Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Goodwin Procter LLP Hogan Lovells LLP Kirkland & Ellis LLP Latham & Watkins LLP McDermott Will & Emery Milbank LLP Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP Morrison & Foerster LLP Perkins Coie Reed Smith Ropes & Gray LLP Sidley Austin LLP Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP White & Case LLP WilmerHale received letters from Acting Chair Andrea Lucas
- Confidence Score
- 1.000
- Claim Maker
- The author
- Context Type
- Legal Document
- Context Details
-
{ "role": "Acting Chair", "person": "Andrea Lucas" } - Subject Tags
- UUID
- 9fdb3733-88f8-4626-956b-279b4b152b10
- Vector Index
- ✗ No vector
- Created
- September 12, 2025 at 12:58 AM (2 days ago)
- Last Updated
- September 12, 2025 at 12:58 AM (2 days ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
194
claims
🔥
2 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Targeting_of_law_firms_and_lawyers_under_the_second_Trump_administration
The Trump administration targeted several law firms, using executive orders and deals involving pro bono work. Lawsuits challenged the actions, resulting in court rulings against the administration.
Similar Claims (0)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
No similar claims found
This claim appears to be unique in the system.