Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
On May 23, Bates ruled that the executive order was unconstitutional, as it "seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn't like" in an effort to insulate the government from challenges.
- Simplified Text
-
Judge Bates ruled the executive order unconstitutional seeks to chill legal representation
- Confidence Score
- 1.000
- Claim Maker
- The author
- Context Type
- Legal/Political Document Analysis
- Context Details
-
{ "date": "May 23", "judge": "Bates", "reason": "seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn't like in an effort to insulate the government from challenges", "ruling": "executive order was unconstitutional" } - UUID
- 9fdb370c-6e02-482c-9f49-ca453c29f62e
- Vector Index
- ✗ No vector
- Created
- September 12, 2025 at 12:58 AM (2 days ago)
- Last Updated
- September 12, 2025 at 12:58 AM (2 days ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
194
claims
🔥
2 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Targeting_of_law_firms_and_lawyers_under_the_second_Trump_administration
The Trump administration targeted several law firms, using executive orders and deals involving pro bono work. Lawsuits challenged the actions, resulting in court rulings against the administration.
Similar Claims (0)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
No similar claims found
This claim appears to be unique in the system.