Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
The firm said that it deliberated on whether to fight the executive order but that even fighting it would be problematic because doing so "would not solve the fundamental problem, which was that clients perceived our firm as being persona non grata with the Administration."[7]
- Simplified Text
-
Paul Weiss said fighting order was problematic clients perceived firm negatively
- Confidence Score
- 1.000
- Claim Maker
- Paul Weiss
- Context Type
- Legal/Political
- Context Details
-
{ "entity": "Paul Weiss", "reason": "clients perceived firm negatively" } - UUID
- 9fdb36f8-f4ee-4a22-a3cf-78c509735323
- Vector Index
- ✗ No vector
- Created
- September 12, 2025 at 12:58 AM (2 days ago)
- Last Updated
- September 12, 2025 at 12:58 AM (2 days ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
194
claims
🔥
2 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Targeting_of_law_firms_and_lawyers_under_the_second_Trump_administration
The Trump administration targeted several law firms, using executive orders and deals involving pro bono work. Lawsuits challenged the actions, resulting in court rulings against the administration.
Similar Claims (0)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
No similar claims found
This claim appears to be unique in the system.