Claim Details

View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.

Back to Claims

Claim Information

Complete details about this extracted claim.

Claim Text
On May 23, Bates ruled that the executive order was unconstitutional, as it "seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn't like" in an effort to insulate the government from challenges.
Simplified Text
On May 23 Bates ruled the executive order was unconstitutional.
Confidence Score
1.000
Claim Maker
The author
Context Type
Legal Document Analysis
Context Details
{
    "date": "May 23",
    "judge": "Bates",
    "reason": "\"seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn't like\" in an effort to insulate the government from challenges",
    "ruling": "executive order was unconstitutional"
}
Subject Tags
Politics Law
UUID
9fdb366a-ed18-404b-8721-cebf3e883310
Vector Index
✗ No vector
Created
September 12, 2025 at 12:56 AM (3 days ago)
Last Updated
September 12, 2025 at 12:56 AM (3 days ago)

Original Sources for this Claim (0)

All source submissions that originally contained this claim.

No sources found

This claim is not associated with any source submissions.

Similar Claims (0)

Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.

No similar claims found

This claim appears to be unique in the system.

Claim Management System - MVP