Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
The bill would have prevented the Court from reviewing state subversive‐control laws even if such legislation patently infringed upon the First Amendment.
- Simplified Text
-
The Jenner-Butler bill would have prevented the Supreme Court from reviewing state subversive-control laws infringing the First Amendment.
- Confidence Score
- 0.900
- Claim Maker
- The author
- Context Type
- News Article
- Context Details
-
{ "bill": "Jenner-Butler bill", "year": "1958", "court": "Supreme Court", "amendment": "First Amendment" } - UUID
- 9fdb03a2-2a0b-4d37-b25b-c0d0ce6685da
- Vector Index
- ✗ No vector
- Created
- September 11, 2025 at 10:34 PM (1 day ago)
- Last Updated
- September 11, 2025 at 10:34 PM (1 day ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
37
claims
🔥
1 day ago
https://www.nytimes.com/1964/01/05/are-there-too-many-lawyers-in-congress.html
A 1964 analysis examines the overrepresentation of lawyers in US Congress, questioning its impact on legislation and political processes. The article explores potential biases and consequences of this demographic imbalance.
Similar Claims (0)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
No similar claims found
This claim appears to be unique in the system.