Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
A larger complement of judges on the D.C. Circuit then refused to allow the three-judge panel ruling to immediately take effect while the full 10-member appeals court decided whether to rehear the matter.
- Simplified Text
-
Larger D.C. Circuit judges refused to allow three-judge panel ruling to take effect.
- Confidence Score
- 1.000
- Claim Maker
- Ann E. Marimow
- Context Type
- News Article
- Context Details
-
{ "court": "D.C. Circuit", "topic": "Federal Spending" } - Subject Tags
- UUID
- 9fc8b140-5ac6-48fb-9a6c-425f03adaa85
- Vector Index
- ✗ No vector
- Created
- September 2, 2025 at 7:59 PM (6 days ago)
- Last Updated
- September 2, 2025 at 7:59 PM (6 days ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
17
claims
🔥
6 days ago
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/27/us/politics/supreme-court-trump-foreign-aid.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20250828&instance_id=161436&nl=the-morning®i_id=122976029&segment_id=204795&smid=url-share&user_id=b25c5730c89e0c73f75709d8f1254337
The Trump administration again requested the Supreme Court to freeze billions in foreign aid, facing legal challenges over its authority to halt congressionally approved funds. Lower courts issued conflicting rulings, leading to the Supreme Court appeal.
Similar Claims (0)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
No similar claims found
This claim appears to be unique in the system.