Claim Details

View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.

Back to Claims

Claim Information

Complete details about this extracted claim.

Claim Text
The mean comprehension aptitude score for the participants in the digital audiobook condition was 25.5 (SD = 5.8), in the e-text condition was 27.5 (SD = 5.5), and in the dual modality condition was 25.5 (SD = 5.4), out of a highest possible score of 38.
Simplified Text
Digital audiobook comprehension aptitude score was 25.5 e-text was 27.5 dual modality was 25.5
Confidence Score
0.500
Claim Maker
The author
Context Type
Website Article
Context Details
{
    "date": null
}
Subject Tags
General
UUID
9fc8a299-6958-456b-b3ce-3c165a95c9f7
Vector Index
✗ No vector
Created
September 2, 2025 at 7:18 PM (1 week ago)
Last Updated
September 2, 2025 at 7:18 PM (1 week ago)

Original Sources for this Claim (1)

All source submissions that originally contained this claim.

Screenshot of https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244016669550?campaign_id=18&emc=edit_hh_20250829&instance_id=161530&nl=well&regi_id=122976029&segment_id=204892&user_id=b25c5730c89e0c73f75709d8f1254337
Does Modality Matter? The Effects of Reading, Listening, and Dual Modality on Comprehension
Pending
Research
33 claims 🔥
1 week ago
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244016669550?campaign_id=18&emc=edit_hh_20250829&instance_id=161530&nl=well&regi_id=122976029&segment_id=204892&user_id=b25c5730c89e0c73f75709d8f1254337

A study investigated if reading, listening, or dual modality impacts comprehension. Results showed no significant differences in immediate or 2-week retention across modalities for college-educated adults.

Reading Comprehension
Listening Comprehension
Dual Modality Learning
Cognitive Psychology
Educational Research
Learning Modalities

Similar Claims (0)

Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.

No similar claims found

This claim appears to be unique in the system.

Claim Management System - MVP