Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
“It seems unlikely that Congress intended, in enacting IEEPA, to depart from its past practice and grant the president unlimited authority to impose tariffs,” a majority of judges wrote in their ruling, citing the “magnitude” of the duties Mr. Trump had put in place.
- Simplified Text
-
Congress unlikely intended IEEPA to grant president unlimited tariff authority judges wrote.
- Confidence Score
- 0.900
- Claim Maker
- Tony Romm and Ana Swanson
- Context Type
- News Article
- Context Details
-
{ "law": "International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)", "date": "2025-08-29", "person": "Donald Trump" } - UUID
- 9fc89b3f-9f3b-4b8a-8d4d-a722e75042a2
- Vector Index
- ✗ No vector
- Created
- September 2, 2025 at 6:57 PM (1 week ago)
- Last Updated
- September 2, 2025 at 6:57 PM (1 week ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
30
claims
🔥
1 week ago
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/29/business/economy/trump-tariffs-appeals-court.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20250830&instance_id=161573&nl=the-morning®i_id=122976029&segment_id=204921&user_id=b25c5730c89e0c73f75709d8f1254337
A federal appeals court ruled many of Trump's tariffs illegal, a major setback to his trade strategy. The ruling is delayed until October, allowing an appeal to the Supreme Court.
Similar Claims (0)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
No similar claims found
This claim appears to be unique in the system.