Claim Details

View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.

Back to Claims

Claim Information

Complete details about this extracted claim.

Claim Text
In May, a federal trade court agreed, invalidating many of the president’s duties on grounds that the law did not grant him “unbounded authority” to wage his global trade war.
Simplified Text
Federal trade court invalidated president's duties law did not grant unbounded authority.
Confidence Score
0.900
Claim Maker
Tony Romm and Ana Swanson
Context Type
News Article
Context Details
{
    "date": "2025-08-29",
    "month": "May",
    "topic": "Duties",
    "person": "Donald Trump"
}
Subject Tags
UUID
9fc89b3d-b146-4e53-a3c7-f67dc34a07cd
Vector Index
✗ No vector
Created
September 2, 2025 at 6:57 PM (1 week ago)
Last Updated
September 2, 2025 at 6:57 PM (1 week ago)

Original Sources for this Claim (1)

All source submissions that originally contained this claim.

Screenshot of https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/29/business/economy/trump-tariffs-appeals-court.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20250830&instance_id=161573&nl=the-morning&regi_id=122976029&segment_id=204921&user_id=b25c5730c89e0c73f75709d8f1254337
30 claims 🔥
1 week ago
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/29/business/economy/trump-tariffs-appeals-court.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20250830&instance_id=161573&nl=the-morning&regi_id=122976029&segment_id=204921&user_id=b25c5730c89e0c73f75709d8f1254337

A federal appeals court ruled many of Trump's tariffs illegal, a major setback to his trade strategy. The ruling is delayed until October, allowing an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Trump
Tariffs
Trade War
US Politics
International Trade
Legal Ruling
Supreme Court

Similar Claims (0)

Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.

No similar claims found

This claim appears to be unique in the system.

Claim Management System - MVP