Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
In a 2-1 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that it did not have jurisdiction in the case and that the Trump administration acted legally in its attempts to claw back the funds, dashing the environmental groups’ hopes of immediately accessing money they were awarded more than a year ago.
- Simplified Text
-
U.S. Court of Appeals found no jurisdiction Trump administration acted legally clawing back funds
- Confidence Score
- 1.000
- Claim Maker
- Claire Brown
- Context Type
- News Article
- Context Details
-
{ "date": "2025-09-02", "court": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit", "ruling": "2-1", "administration": "Trump administration" } - UUID
- 9fc895ca-ac96-4009-9dd8-23900576a836
- Vector Index
- ✗ No vector
- Created
- September 2, 2025 at 6:42 PM (6 days ago)
- Last Updated
- September 2, 2025 at 6:42 PM (6 days ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
21
claims
🔥
6 days ago
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/02/climate/climate-grants-frozen.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20250902&instance_id=161747&nl=breaking-news®i_id=122976029&segment_id=205119&user_id=b25c5730c89e0c73f75709d8f1254337
An appeals court ruled against nonprofits seeking $16 billion in frozen climate grants, upholding the Trump administration's actions. The court lacked jurisdiction, deeming the government's actions legal. The nonprofits plan to continue their legal fight.
Similar Claims (0)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
No similar claims found
This claim appears to be unique in the system.