Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
Under the parties’ 2014 restated agreement, UCLA does not pay rent at the Rose Bowl.
- Simplified Text
-
Under the 2014 agreement, UCLA doesn't pay rent at the Rose Bowl.
- Confidence Score
- 1.000
- UUID
- 8e6d1759-6a4f-4682-b2fe-bf80ff720ada
- Vector Index
- âś— No vector
- Created
- December 6, 2025 at 12:22 AM (8 months ago)
- Last Updated
- December 6, 2025 at 12:22 AM (8 months ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
13
claims
🔥
1 week ago
https://nytimes.com/athletic/6795416/2025/11/12/rose-bowl-ucla-sofi-stadium-restraining-order
Similar Claims (5)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
-
Simplified: Jarmond and Agostini said Rose Bowl lease limits revenue from seating and sponsorships.8 months ago
-
Simplified: The dispute over UCLA's Rose Bowl lease, which ends in 2043, is financial and not an emergency.8 months ago
-
Simplified: Chalfant's ruling allows UCLA to discuss with SoFi; Pasadena seeks to enforce the lease through 2044.8 months ago
-
Simplified: Rose Bowl renovations begin Jan 2, planned with UCLA's long-term occupancy in mind.8 months ago
-
Simplified: Pasadena sued UCLA on Oct 29, alleging private negotiations with SoFi Stadium since March.8 months ago