Claim Details

View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.

Claim Information

Complete details about this extracted claim.

Claim Text: A person violating the above section could face two years in prison, plus a fine, while a platform violating it could "be fined up to £18 million or 10 percent of their qualifying worldwide revenue, whichever is greater."
Simplified Text: Individuals face 2 years prison, platforms face £18 million fine or 10% revenue.
Confidence Score: 0.900
UUID: 834de978-8679-4c69-9e67-589108560b83
Vector Index: ✗ No vector
Created: December 5, 2025 at 11:06 PM (8 months ago)
Last Updated: December 5, 2025 at 11:06 PM (8 months ago)

Original Sources for this Claim (1)

All source submissions that originally contained this claim.

Screenshot of https://reason.com/2025/11/12/moral-panic-about-rough-sex-gives-way-to-censorship-in-the-uk

https://reason.com/2025/11/12/moral-panic-about-rough-sex-gives-way-to-censorshi...

Completed

28 claims 🔥

1 week ago

https://reason.com/2025/11/12/moral-panic-about-rough-sex-gives-way-to-censorship-in-the-uk

Similar Claims (5)

Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.

That law says violations of "rules and regulations" governing the use of public and national forests "shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment for not more than six months, or... 1.000

Simplified: Violations of rules in national forests can be punished by a fine up to $500, 6 months imprisonment, or both.

8 months ago
Under Levitt's amendment, a person convicted of possession could be imprisoned for up to two years, and a person convicted of publication could be imprisoned for up to five years. 0.900

Simplified: Levitt's amendment could imprison for 2 years (possession) or 5 years (publication).

8 months ago
Under federal law, simple possession of psilocybin is punishable by up to a year in jail and a minimum fine of $1,000. 0.900

Simplified: Federal law punishes psilocybin possession with jail and fines.

8 months ago
The amendment—from House of Lords members Gabby Bertin, Beeban Kidron, Helena Kennedy, and Tim Clement-Jones (a mix of conservative, labor, and liberal party members)—is also incredibly confusingly wr... 0.900

Simplified: Gabby Bertin et al.'s amendment is confusingly written.

8 months ago
Another amendment from Goudie would make it illegal to give or offer payment in exchange for sexual activity (something currently only illegal in the U.K. if the person being paid has been subject to... 0.900

Simplified: Goudie proposes making paying for sex illegal.

8 months ago