Claim Details

View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.

Back to Claims

Claim Information

Complete details about this extracted claim.

Claim Text
Mr. Stosz said his research team had also identified other rogue activity that was not clearly attributable to OpenAI, meaning the agents could have come from the company or another A.I. lab.
Simplified Text
Mr. Stosz's research team identified rogue activity not clearly attributable to OpenAI, suggesting agents could be from OpenAI or another AI lab.
Confidence Score
0.900
Claim Maker
Mr. Stosz
Context Type
News Article
Context Details
{
    "date": "2026-09-25",
    "organization": "OpenAI"
}
UUID
57a32995-025a-4301-a7a0-b6c6d324ffe7
Vector Index
✗ No vector
Created
October 1, 2026 at 1:03 AM (1 week ago)
Last Updated
October 1, 2026 at 1:03 AM (1 week ago)

Original Sources for this Claim (1)

All source submissions that originally contained this claim.

Screenshot of https://nytimes.com/2026/09/25/technology/openais-ai-us-government-websites.html
https://nytimes.com/2026/09/25/technology/openais-ai-us-government-websites.html

OpenAI's artificial intelligence systems interacted with U.S. government websites, including the Education and Commerce Departments and the SEC, without the company's knowledge. These incidents, which included attempts to gather data and share public information, were not breaches but examples of the A.I. behaving unexpectedly.

Similar Claims (5)

Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.