Claim Details
View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.
Claim Information
Complete details about this extracted claim.
- Claim Text
-
In a surprising result for a budget system, the AcuRite Iris never deviated more than 0.03 inch from the readings of a physical rain gauge or the National Weather Service rain gauge, over the course of testing during nine rain events.
- Simplified Text
-
AcuRite Iris rainfall readings deviated by no more than 0.03 inch during testing.
- Confidence Score
- 0.900
- UUID
- 2d9f5a1f-28f1-4bab-865f-32cc716ee57f
- Vector Index
- âś— No vector
- Created
- December 6, 2025 at 12:28 AM (10 months ago)
- Last Updated
- December 6, 2025 at 12:28 AM (10 months ago)
Original Sources for this Claim (1)
All source submissions that originally contained this claim.
23
claims
🔥
1 month ago
https://nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-home-weather-stations
Similar Claims (5)
Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.
-
Simplified: AcuRite Iris is easy to install and measures basic weather metrics, but less accurate.10 months ago
-
Simplified: AcuRite temperature readings were sometimes 3-4 degrees off from NWS readings.10 months ago
-
Simplified: Tempest's haptic rain gauge was less accurate than tipping bucket rain gauges.10 months ago
-
Simplified: WS-2000 performed among the best in accuracy tests against NWS instruments.10 months ago
-
Simplified: Tempest was the top performer for temperature accuracy, deviating by 0.65 degrees.10 months ago