Claim Details

View detailed information about this claim and its related sources.

Back to Claims

Claim Information

Complete details about this extracted claim.

Claim Text
Some New York City police officers used Flock Safety, a system of automated license-plate readers that has been criticized as an invasion of privacy, to run searches even though the Police Department did not have a contract to do so.
Simplified Text
Some New York City police officers used Flock Safety's automated license-plate readers for searches without a departmental contract.
Confidence Score
1.000
Claim Maker
Maria Cramer
Context Type
News Article
Context Details
{
    "date": "2026-09-28",
    "technology": "Flock Safety",
    "organization": "New York City Police Department"
}
UUID
091ea333-8ec5-46c8-9265-79ed7de0a63b
Vector Index
✗ No vector
Created
September 30, 2026 at 11:07 AM (1 week ago)
Last Updated
September 30, 2026 at 11:07 AM (1 week ago)

Original Sources for this Claim (1)

All source submissions that originally contained this claim.

Screenshot of https://nytimes.com/2026/09/28/nyregion/nyc-flock-nypd-surveillance-cameras.html
https://nytimes.com/2026/09/28/nyregion/nyc-flock-nypd-surveillance-cameras.html

New York City police officers used Flock Safety's license-plate readers for over 1,700 searches between 2023 and 2025, despite the department not having a contract with the company. This ad hoc use raises privacy concerns and questions about departmental oversight.

Similar Claims (5)

Other claims identified as semantically similar to this one.